First Illuminati Electronic Mass Media Psy-Op -- Orson Welles 1938’s Radio Broadcast of “The War of the Worlds.”
The original radio broadcast of “War of the Worlds” in 1938, which was noted for generating “accidental” and “unfortunate” panic and hysteria throughout the United States when listeners tuned in to what they thought was a real invasion by Martians, was the first electronic mass media psychological operation (psy-op) of The Illuminati, funded directly by the Rockefeller Foundation funneled thru The Princeton Radio Project, and guided at every stage by members of the Council on Foreign Relations to study the American public’s reaction to a hoaxed false panic situation.
Actor Orson Welles, the creator of the program and the “news announcer” of this infamous broadcast, later apologized for the hysteria this radio show created. Few people realize that this broadcast was the opening salvo of mass societal psychological manipulation by the paid minions of The Illuminati to advance their plans for a New World Order, funded by the Rockefellers and guided by CFR members Frank Stanton and psychologist Dr. Hadley Cantril.
Operating on a grant from the Rockefellers, The Princeton University Radio Project, under supervision of psychologist Dr. Paul F. Lazarsfeld, along with Frank Stanton (later head of CBS Radio and Television) and Dr. Hadley Cantril hired Orson Welles to adapt H. G. Wells’ fiction book “The War of the Worlds” to the radio format in order to study the behavior of citizens under panic conditions. Not only was the stress and panic of a fictional Martian invasion the night before Halloween anticipated by its producers; it was purposely crafted to create terror so as to judge how American society and groups of people within its citizenry would react under the pressure of an imminent attack by creatures from another planet.
This very first electronic mass media “psy-op” was heard by 6 million people, 1,700,000 of whom believed the broadcast to be genuine, and 1,200,000 of whom were frightened enough to take action -- either by running away or preparing to fight the invaders. Later, when the broadcast was revealed to be simply a dramatic exercise which had been mistakenly taken seriously by over a million people, an apparently repentant Welles apologized repeatedly over the course of the next few weeks in newspapers and radio broadcasts for any accidents which may have occurred as a result. The idea of using an interrupting news-bulletin in the middle of what seemed like regular music programming was deemed excessively cruel, manipulative and deceptive.
What the general public did not understand, and what even fewer people guessed, was that this cruel manipulation had been purposely planned to produce precisely this effective level of stress and terror by its CFR promoters working for the Rockefellers and their Illuminati masters. It has been said that Welles even received death threats -- not by members of the general public, but through the agents of the Rockefellers should he ever reveal publicly that the “unforeseen” reaction to this broadcast was precisely what it's perpetrators had hoped to achieve in order to analyze, demographically, psycho-graphically and statistically, the reaction of the citizenry of the United States.
This secret test, financed and directed by The Rockefellers and guided by their minions from the Council on Foreign Relations (both Stanton and Cantril were members) used it to judge susceptibility to belief influenced by worry, phobias, fatalism and the fear of war. Members of the general public were later interviewed and their reactions to the broadcast were paired against such variables as religion, education, year and make of car, reading materials, job security, etc. Cantril later wrote a paper entitled: “The Invasion from Mars -- A Study in the Psychology of Panic.” Cantril’s study examined the power of the radio broadcast media and its effects upon a population under the direct influence of fear.
So despite Orson Welles many public pronouncement and apologies to the general public for the terror, panic and confusion his adaptation and broadcast of H. G. Wells’ “War of the Worlds” had caused, the covert reality is that the Rockefellers and members of the Council on Foreign Relations actively sought to panic members of the general public to gauge their reaction to a horrific, frightful scenario -- one which was false, yet had been deliberately constructed to be perceived to be real, genuinely terrifying and life-threatening.
This first electronic stress test was just in time to anticipate the dawn of the age of television. Only two years later, again with Rockefeller Foundation money, Cantril established the Office of Public Opinion Research at Princeton. Among the studies conducted by the OPOR was analyzing the effectiveness of propaganda produced by the forerunner of the CIA, known as the OSS (Office of Strategic Services).
During WWII, Edward R. Murrow, also a CFR member, was assisted by money from the Rockefeller Foundation and Dr. Cantril to establish the Princeton Listening Center, whose purpose was to spy on Nazi radio propaganda and judge its effectiveness.
From this project sprang the FBIS (Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service) which eventually became the US Information Agency, used by the National Security Council as its chief disseminator of propaganda after WWII.
After leaving CBS, Frank Stanton became the Chairman of the RAND Corporation, an extremely influential government think tank, which researched among other topics, mass brainwashing of an unsuspecting public through the mass media.
At the end of the original radio broadcast of “The War of the Worlds” the announcer (Welles) is no longer heard; instead, the voice of a field artillery commander comes on the air, repeatedly calling the code: “2X 2L calling CQ... 2X 2L calling CQ... is there anyone on the air?”
The “2 X” can easily be thought of as a “double cross” (two X’s or crosses); the “2L” is easier -- To Hell. Or Together, “Double Cross to Hell.” Quite an appropriate way to end a fake broadcast featuring a hoaxed alien invasion from Mars created to terrify the citizenry of the United States in order to measure their reactions to artificially induced stress, like laboratory rats under the microscope of the Council of Foreign Relations for their hidden masters -- The Illuminati.
=====================
In 1917, Marxist John Dewey was the first political person to publicly promote the threat of an invasion from outer space when he spoke these words: “"Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet. In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose." John Dewey, New York 1917.
Decades later, President Ronald Reagan made a similar observation at the United Nations when he said: “"In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us realize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world." - President Ronald Reagan, in a speech made to the 42nd General Assembly of the United Nations, Sept. 21, 1987
Seventy years and two World Wars separate those statements; yet the people who would take advantage of the mass media and use it to terrorize an unsuspecting population stand ready to again promote a similar scenario. The radio broadcast of “The War of the Worlds” may just be a precursor to another fake outer space alien invasion created thru “Project Blue Beam.”
One wonders how many people will panic and die needlessly to satisfy the blood lusts of The Illuminati should this more chillingly realistic scenario transpire at the end of 2012!
L C Vincent
lcvincent888@gmail.com
Copyright
2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved. No portion of this material
may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the
expressed written permission of the author.
Showing posts with label radio. Show all posts
Showing posts with label radio. Show all posts
Saturday, October 9, 2010
CIA Runs American TV Network News From Day One for the Illuminati
There is No "News"; It's All Programming!
After WWII, with the emergence of three rival television networks, each with their own news departments, most Americans would have argued that the new age of television would grant them a multiplicity of sources and viewpoints. They would point to the three competing television networks: ABC, CBS and NBC, as proof that the capitalist system of competition worked to provide them with the latest news, and that their respective news departments were working to scoop each other to bring the American public the most honest, comprehensive and in depth analysis of the stories behind the day’s headlines.
Yet from their very inception, each of the American television networks have been guided by men who were a product of and beholden to America’s intelligence agencies. From the beginning, the men who ran ABC, CBS and NBC as well as those sitting on their boards of directors, had the deepest ties to the CIA, the Council on Foreign Relations, Rothschild Banks and the Rockefeller Foundation. From the very beginning, the American television networks and American news media have been a product that has been created, shaped and molded to promote the aims of the globalists and their New World Order, guided by the “light” of the Illuminati.
Three Networks, One Master
According to the late investigative reporter Eustace Mullins, CBS Chairman William S. Paley was both conduit and operative for the CIA. Many directors of CBS had CIA ties. NBC and ABC Television networks were also riddled with CIA influenced directors with links to this U.S. intelligence agency. A pattern of interlocking directorships reveals these patterns in multiple variations. Linkages such as multiple directors of various Federal Reserve Bank branches, directors to numerous banks with Rothschild and JP Morgan connections, and links to Kuhn Loeb &; Co., First City Bancorp and The Institute of Strategic Studies in London, as well as various Rockefeller foundations and memberships in the Council on Foreign Relations, were and are commonplace.
So while the illusion of 3 competing television networks with three apparently independent, competing news departments remain the public facade of television journalism, the reality is that the interlocking directorates and board memberships of multiple international businesses clearly illustrate that the members of the boards of directors of all three networks partake in numerous symbiotic and parallel financial investments, which point to inescapable, even severe conflicts of interest.
Yet without these overlapping network directorships heavily larded with CIA - Rockefeller - Morgan - Rothschild - CFR linkages, the CIA made a concerted effort from the start of the electronic information age to not simply shade and tilt news stories to their liking, but to actively recruit reporters and journalists as CIA assets to be used to quash stories they wished ignored, or to distort and selectively bias the presentation of stories they wished to use for their own purposes.
Making a “Mock” ery of The News
The code name for this work, appropriately enough, was “Operation Mockingbird.” A mockingbird is a creature with the natural gift to mimic or mirror whatever song another bird makes. So, too, the CIA's “embedded” reporters, editors and owners would mirror whatever particular slant The Agency wished the general public to perceive, or the opposite: they would instruct their sources to bury or ignore stories which did not serve their purpose.
According to author Steve Kangas, in his article “Anatomy of the Overclass”, the CIA recruited 25 media organizations and over 400 reporters and journalists to do their bidding since the late 1940’s. This was revealed to the Church Committee in 1975, and many felt that The Agency’s reach went even deeper. The list of assets and operatives included:
* William Paley (President, CBS Network)
* ABC Network
* NBC Network
* Philip and Katharine Graham (Publishers, Washington Post)
* Henry Luce (Publisher, Time and Life magazine)
* Arthur Hays Sulzberger (Publisher, N.Y. Times)
* Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star)
* Hal Hendrix (Pulitzer Prize winner, Miami News)
* Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal)
* James Copley (Copley News Services)
* Joseph Harrison (Editor, Christian Science Monitor)
* C.D. Jackson (Fortune)
* Walter Pincus (Reporter, Washington Post)
* Associated Press
* United Press International
* Reuters
* Hearst Newspapers
* Scripps-Howard
* Newsweek magazine
* Mutual Broadcasting System
* Miami Herald
* New York Herald-Tribune
Perhaps it would have been more prudent if the Church committee had instead asked which news organizations the CIA had not subverted; it would surely have produced a shorter list!
In the case of the Washington Post, “...owner Philip Graham was a military intelligence officer in World War II, and later became close friends with CIA figures like Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Desmond FitzGerald and Richard Helms. He inherited the Post by marrying Katherine Graham, whose father owned it.” Graham was reported to have committed suicide in 1963.
Another example of the CIA’s reach: According to Kangas, “...Sig Mickelson was a CIA asset the entire time he was president of CBS News from 1954 to 1961. Later he went on to become president of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, two major outlets of CIA propaganda.”
But even worse -- the CIA actually “owned” (thru proxy) several media outlets, including Capital Cities, whose owner, William Casey, later became the Director of the CIA under Ronald Reagan. Capital Cities later bought the entire ABC Television Network.
To illustrate the CIA’s amazingly thorough and pervasive control over the flow of information, just consider this one amazing tidbit. Nearly everyone alive with any knowledge of the John Kennedy assassination knows about “The Zapruder Film," the film shot by Abraham Zapruder, which purports to show JFK being hit by one bullet to the head.
Forgetting, for the moment, that the Zapruder film has been recently revealed to have been altered and rearranged via computer animation before ever being made available to the general public, this writer was amazed to discover while doing research for this story that there are actually numerous “other” films of the JFK assassination, ALL OF WHICH remain locked in the vaults of various news organizations, and which have never seen the public light of day. As revealed by author Richard E. Sprague, in “The Taking of America, 1-2-3”, these films include:
The Dorman movie - Private
The Robert Hughes movie - Private
The David Weigman TV footage - NBC
The Malcolm Couch TV footage - ABC
The John Martin movie - Private
The question that immediately comes to mind upon realizing that ALL of this footage has been so suppressed that its very existence is unknown to the general public, begs the question: WHY? The answer is equally obvious -- it’s airing would provide proof positive of a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, a conspiracy which no one would any longer dismiss as a “theory.”
There is probably no better example of the influence and weight the CIA can bring to bear on unwanted news than the story of San Jose’ (California) Mercury-News reporter Gary Webb.
In 1996, “crack” reporter Gary Webb ran a voluminously detailed three part article entitled “Dark Alliance”, exposing the CIA’s involvement in the importation and distribution of crack cocaine throughout the Los Angeles ghettos, while also supplying the notorious Cripps and Bloods gangs with drugs to distribute throughout America.
As Susan Bell of the “Independent/UK” newspaper wrote: “Webb's pieces were not dealing with nameless peasants slaughtered in some distant republic, but demonstrated a clear link between the CIA and the suppliers of the gangs delivering crack to the ghetto of Watts, in South Central Los Angeles.” Not surprisingly, there was very little “pick up” of the story by other “independent” news agencies and organizations., many of which the CIA controlled.
Shaping Perception by Casting Doubt and Aspersions
Despite meticulous research and multiple source verification, Webb and the Mercury-News were mercilessly attacked by The Washington Post, the NY Times and The Los Angeles Times. According to author Kangas, The Washington Post attack article was written by the long time CIA journalist, Walter Pincus.
Eventually, under this savage barrage of criticism, the Mercury-News first distanced itself from Webb’s series of articles, then disowned them as not being properly substantiated. Webb lost his job at the Mercury-News and became a freelancer.
On December 13, 2004, Pulitzer Prize winning reporter Gary Webb was found in his apartment shot dead, an apparent “suicide” according to the coroner -- although the coroner’s report did note that Webb had to shoot himself TWICE to get the job done... Of course....!
Entertain, Distract, Divide and Conquer
Besides the repression and burial of disturbing stories, distraction and diversion are the other aspects of the Zionist--Illuminati game plan as revealed in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Nowhere can this be found more prevalent than on our network “news” nightly reports, which are often filled with stories about sports stars, movie stars, media celebrities and scandals. A prime example of this ploy was the The O.J. Simpson television-news “tsunami” of his murder trial which was used to take the heat off of many of Bill Clinton’s constitutional transgressions by moving the spotlight away from Clinton to O.J.
Conveniently, our electronic news media always seem preoccupied with some scandal or other that often seems to coincidentally emerge at the exact same time when news of an embarrassing political nature vies for public attention. As I write this, the “saga” of actress Lindsey Lohan’s 90 day jail sentence for parole violation, and her tearful courtroom entreaties, has effectively bumped the Obama administration’s decision not to prosecute members of the Black Panther Party in a clear cut case of voter intimidation outside of a voting place, despite the fact that members of the Panthers have stated in a recording that White “Cracker” babies should be killed . The networks have their priorities.... and keeping us informed about events which actually have a bearing upon our lives is not one of them.
The Hydra Speaks with One Voice
To anyone who seriously wishes to see the difference between American “news” reporting of a controversial, political event versus reportage from outside this country, the easiest method is to select one internationally important story and see what is revealed and suppressed by reading the same story on the internet from multiple news sources around the world. One quickly gathers the essence of the information that our “handlers” would prefer us not to know. Perhaps the most obvious example of this recent phenomenon is the story concerning the Israeli interdiction (assault) of the relief ship convoy to Gaza.
Other than internet sources from other countries, one could hardly find a “discouraging word” from any U.S. media outlet or commentator, whether on television, radio, newspapers or news magazines. The consensus was brutally simple: Israel was correct to “protect” itself by boarding these supply ships with armed commandos dangling from helicopters in the middle of the night and killing more than 10 unarmed people, while confiscating all recording devices for good measure. Surveying the American national media about this story, one could ONLY conclude that there could possibly be NO OTHER side than Israel’s until one read internet reports from other countries citing the logical and inhuman inconsistencies ignored by Israel’s American media propaganda outlets.
And so it goes. It should come as no surprise, then, that Senator Joseph Lieberman has introduced a bill in the U.S. Senate to enable any president to turn off the Internet for “national security” purposes. Indeed, as Lieberman has pointed out, China already has this ability and we should too! Right. China should be our “model” for news reportage and in-depth analysis, and when a news story is too “controversial” then just shut off the ‘net for the sake of “national security.” What could be simpler?
As we face the ever further restrictions on our speech, assembly, press freedoms (Supreme Court nominee Ellen Kagan could not even bring herself to admit that the First Amendment prohibits government censorship), it behooves us to realize that this continued assault on our right to know goes hand in hand with The Illuminati’s plan to create an ever further dumbed down citizenry, too distracted and stupefied by meaningless stories of celebrity and drama to discern the critically important stories which crucially impact our God-given freedoms and our way of life.
The time may soon come when the right to even question public officials will be looked upon as a “terrorist assault” and asking embarrassing questions of the political elite may be codified as “hate speech” thanks to the Illuminati’s continued corruption of our thought and language, along with their control and shaping of the flow of what might be considered “news.”
As guardians of the heritage of our Founding Fathers, we must make sure that this is the one dawning day which will never cast its light upon our future.
L C Vincent
lcvincent888@gmail.com
Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved. No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.
After WWII, with the emergence of three rival television networks, each with their own news departments, most Americans would have argued that the new age of television would grant them a multiplicity of sources and viewpoints. They would point to the three competing television networks: ABC, CBS and NBC, as proof that the capitalist system of competition worked to provide them with the latest news, and that their respective news departments were working to scoop each other to bring the American public the most honest, comprehensive and in depth analysis of the stories behind the day’s headlines.
Yet from their very inception, each of the American television networks have been guided by men who were a product of and beholden to America’s intelligence agencies. From the beginning, the men who ran ABC, CBS and NBC as well as those sitting on their boards of directors, had the deepest ties to the CIA, the Council on Foreign Relations, Rothschild Banks and the Rockefeller Foundation. From the very beginning, the American television networks and American news media have been a product that has been created, shaped and molded to promote the aims of the globalists and their New World Order, guided by the “light” of the Illuminati.
Three Networks, One Master
According to the late investigative reporter Eustace Mullins, CBS Chairman William S. Paley was both conduit and operative for the CIA. Many directors of CBS had CIA ties. NBC and ABC Television networks were also riddled with CIA influenced directors with links to this U.S. intelligence agency. A pattern of interlocking directorships reveals these patterns in multiple variations. Linkages such as multiple directors of various Federal Reserve Bank branches, directors to numerous banks with Rothschild and JP Morgan connections, and links to Kuhn Loeb &; Co., First City Bancorp and The Institute of Strategic Studies in London, as well as various Rockefeller foundations and memberships in the Council on Foreign Relations, were and are commonplace.
So while the illusion of 3 competing television networks with three apparently independent, competing news departments remain the public facade of television journalism, the reality is that the interlocking directorates and board memberships of multiple international businesses clearly illustrate that the members of the boards of directors of all three networks partake in numerous symbiotic and parallel financial investments, which point to inescapable, even severe conflicts of interest.
Yet without these overlapping network directorships heavily larded with CIA - Rockefeller - Morgan - Rothschild - CFR linkages, the CIA made a concerted effort from the start of the electronic information age to not simply shade and tilt news stories to their liking, but to actively recruit reporters and journalists as CIA assets to be used to quash stories they wished ignored, or to distort and selectively bias the presentation of stories they wished to use for their own purposes.
Making a “Mock” ery of The News
The code name for this work, appropriately enough, was “Operation Mockingbird.” A mockingbird is a creature with the natural gift to mimic or mirror whatever song another bird makes. So, too, the CIA's “embedded” reporters, editors and owners would mirror whatever particular slant The Agency wished the general public to perceive, or the opposite: they would instruct their sources to bury or ignore stories which did not serve their purpose.
According to author Steve Kangas, in his article “Anatomy of the Overclass”, the CIA recruited 25 media organizations and over 400 reporters and journalists to do their bidding since the late 1940’s. This was revealed to the Church Committee in 1975, and many felt that The Agency’s reach went even deeper. The list of assets and operatives included:
* William Paley (President, CBS Network)
* ABC Network
* NBC Network
* Philip and Katharine Graham (Publishers, Washington Post)
* Henry Luce (Publisher, Time and Life magazine)
* Arthur Hays Sulzberger (Publisher, N.Y. Times)
* Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star)
* Hal Hendrix (Pulitzer Prize winner, Miami News)
* Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal)
* James Copley (Copley News Services)
* Joseph Harrison (Editor, Christian Science Monitor)
* C.D. Jackson (Fortune)
* Walter Pincus (Reporter, Washington Post)
* Associated Press
* United Press International
* Reuters
* Hearst Newspapers
* Scripps-Howard
* Newsweek magazine
* Mutual Broadcasting System
* Miami Herald
* New York Herald-Tribune
Perhaps it would have been more prudent if the Church committee had instead asked which news organizations the CIA had not subverted; it would surely have produced a shorter list!
In the case of the Washington Post, “...owner Philip Graham was a military intelligence officer in World War II, and later became close friends with CIA figures like Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Desmond FitzGerald and Richard Helms. He inherited the Post by marrying Katherine Graham, whose father owned it.” Graham was reported to have committed suicide in 1963.
Another example of the CIA’s reach: According to Kangas, “...Sig Mickelson was a CIA asset the entire time he was president of CBS News from 1954 to 1961. Later he went on to become president of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, two major outlets of CIA propaganda.”
But even worse -- the CIA actually “owned” (thru proxy) several media outlets, including Capital Cities, whose owner, William Casey, later became the Director of the CIA under Ronald Reagan. Capital Cities later bought the entire ABC Television Network.
To illustrate the CIA’s amazingly thorough and pervasive control over the flow of information, just consider this one amazing tidbit. Nearly everyone alive with any knowledge of the John Kennedy assassination knows about “The Zapruder Film," the film shot by Abraham Zapruder, which purports to show JFK being hit by one bullet to the head.
Forgetting, for the moment, that the Zapruder film has been recently revealed to have been altered and rearranged via computer animation before ever being made available to the general public, this writer was amazed to discover while doing research for this story that there are actually numerous “other” films of the JFK assassination, ALL OF WHICH remain locked in the vaults of various news organizations, and which have never seen the public light of day. As revealed by author Richard E. Sprague, in “The Taking of America, 1-2-3”, these films include:
The Dorman movie - Private
The Robert Hughes movie - Private
The David Weigman TV footage - NBC
The Malcolm Couch TV footage - ABC
The John Martin movie - Private
The question that immediately comes to mind upon realizing that ALL of this footage has been so suppressed that its very existence is unknown to the general public, begs the question: WHY? The answer is equally obvious -- it’s airing would provide proof positive of a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, a conspiracy which no one would any longer dismiss as a “theory.”
There is probably no better example of the influence and weight the CIA can bring to bear on unwanted news than the story of San Jose’ (California) Mercury-News reporter Gary Webb.
In 1996, “crack” reporter Gary Webb ran a voluminously detailed three part article entitled “Dark Alliance”, exposing the CIA’s involvement in the importation and distribution of crack cocaine throughout the Los Angeles ghettos, while also supplying the notorious Cripps and Bloods gangs with drugs to distribute throughout America.
As Susan Bell of the “Independent/UK” newspaper wrote: “Webb's pieces were not dealing with nameless peasants slaughtered in some distant republic, but demonstrated a clear link between the CIA and the suppliers of the gangs delivering crack to the ghetto of Watts, in South Central Los Angeles.” Not surprisingly, there was very little “pick up” of the story by other “independent” news agencies and organizations., many of which the CIA controlled.
Shaping Perception by Casting Doubt and Aspersions
Despite meticulous research and multiple source verification, Webb and the Mercury-News were mercilessly attacked by The Washington Post, the NY Times and The Los Angeles Times. According to author Kangas, The Washington Post attack article was written by the long time CIA journalist, Walter Pincus.
Eventually, under this savage barrage of criticism, the Mercury-News first distanced itself from Webb’s series of articles, then disowned them as not being properly substantiated. Webb lost his job at the Mercury-News and became a freelancer.
On December 13, 2004, Pulitzer Prize winning reporter Gary Webb was found in his apartment shot dead, an apparent “suicide” according to the coroner -- although the coroner’s report did note that Webb had to shoot himself TWICE to get the job done... Of course....!
Entertain, Distract, Divide and Conquer
Besides the repression and burial of disturbing stories, distraction and diversion are the other aspects of the Zionist--Illuminati game plan as revealed in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Nowhere can this be found more prevalent than on our network “news” nightly reports, which are often filled with stories about sports stars, movie stars, media celebrities and scandals. A prime example of this ploy was the The O.J. Simpson television-news “tsunami” of his murder trial which was used to take the heat off of many of Bill Clinton’s constitutional transgressions by moving the spotlight away from Clinton to O.J.
Conveniently, our electronic news media always seem preoccupied with some scandal or other that often seems to coincidentally emerge at the exact same time when news of an embarrassing political nature vies for public attention. As I write this, the “saga” of actress Lindsey Lohan’s 90 day jail sentence for parole violation, and her tearful courtroom entreaties, has effectively bumped the Obama administration’s decision not to prosecute members of the Black Panther Party in a clear cut case of voter intimidation outside of a voting place, despite the fact that members of the Panthers have stated in a recording that White “Cracker” babies should be killed . The networks have their priorities.... and keeping us informed about events which actually have a bearing upon our lives is not one of them.
The Hydra Speaks with One Voice
To anyone who seriously wishes to see the difference between American “news” reporting of a controversial, political event versus reportage from outside this country, the easiest method is to select one internationally important story and see what is revealed and suppressed by reading the same story on the internet from multiple news sources around the world. One quickly gathers the essence of the information that our “handlers” would prefer us not to know. Perhaps the most obvious example of this recent phenomenon is the story concerning the Israeli interdiction (assault) of the relief ship convoy to Gaza.
Other than internet sources from other countries, one could hardly find a “discouraging word” from any U.S. media outlet or commentator, whether on television, radio, newspapers or news magazines. The consensus was brutally simple: Israel was correct to “protect” itself by boarding these supply ships with armed commandos dangling from helicopters in the middle of the night and killing more than 10 unarmed people, while confiscating all recording devices for good measure. Surveying the American national media about this story, one could ONLY conclude that there could possibly be NO OTHER side than Israel’s until one read internet reports from other countries citing the logical and inhuman inconsistencies ignored by Israel’s American media propaganda outlets.
And so it goes. It should come as no surprise, then, that Senator Joseph Lieberman has introduced a bill in the U.S. Senate to enable any president to turn off the Internet for “national security” purposes. Indeed, as Lieberman has pointed out, China already has this ability and we should too! Right. China should be our “model” for news reportage and in-depth analysis, and when a news story is too “controversial” then just shut off the ‘net for the sake of “national security.” What could be simpler?
As we face the ever further restrictions on our speech, assembly, press freedoms (Supreme Court nominee Ellen Kagan could not even bring herself to admit that the First Amendment prohibits government censorship), it behooves us to realize that this continued assault on our right to know goes hand in hand with The Illuminati’s plan to create an ever further dumbed down citizenry, too distracted and stupefied by meaningless stories of celebrity and drama to discern the critically important stories which crucially impact our God-given freedoms and our way of life.
The time may soon come when the right to even question public officials will be looked upon as a “terrorist assault” and asking embarrassing questions of the political elite may be codified as “hate speech” thanks to the Illuminati’s continued corruption of our thought and language, along with their control and shaping of the flow of what might be considered “news.”
As guardians of the heritage of our Founding Fathers, we must make sure that this is the one dawning day which will never cast its light upon our future.
L C Vincent
lcvincent888@gmail.com
Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved. No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.
Tuesday, September 29, 2009
Conservative Talk Show Hosts Never Question 9/11
Cardboard Cutout “Conservatives” Occupying Our Airwaves
by L C Vincent
Quick! Name one major conservative radio or television talk show host who questions the official “U.S. Government Conspiracy Theory” about the events of 9/11. The theory that 19 Arab Hijackers, using box cutters, commandeered 4 passenger jets, slammed two of them into the twin towers of the World Trade Center, causing the collapse of THREE of those towers (let’s not forget building #7), and then crashed another jet into the Pentagon, while the passengers on the last plane overpowered the hijackers, causing it to crash into an empty field in Shanksville, PA. Now quick... name one self-styled “conservative” radio talk show host who has ever expressed even so much as a shadow of doubt about this official government fairy-tale. You can’t.
The irony is that while talk radio is dominated by supposedly conservative talk show hosts, and Fox News dominates the television ratings with its so-called conservative commentators, not one of them has ever so much as raised an eyebrow regarding the thousands of discrepancies between the government’s prefabricated excuses regarding 9/11 versus the mind-numbing black hole of lies which the “official government” version of 9/11 exposes, along with the bottomless pit of depravity skeptical questioning further reveals.
Try it for yourself. Stop if you see one name here that has ever done anything other than provide you with a “salute the flag, click your heels, go kill Muslims and Al Qaeda” propositions to their listeners regarding 9/11:
o Rush Limbaugh
o Bill O’Reilly
o Glenn Beck
o Neil Boortz
o Jerry Doyle
o Michael Savage
o Laura Ingraham
o Laura Crowley
o Mark Levine
o Bob Grant
o Lars Larson
o G. Gordon Liddy
o Phil Hendrie
o Michael Medved
o Don Imus
o Tammy Bruce
In many respects I find this list rather remarkable.
Certainly, these people are not simply of average intelligence; if anything, they are substantially above average. And certainly, these people’s interests are definitely socio-political; their commentary almost always centers around politics, society and current events. Moreover, all of these people have “jobs” that, by their very definition, require them to be not simply “current” about current events, but to discover the real truths that lurk behind the headlines.
So given all of the above, and given that these people dominate our radio and television airwaves while allegedly personifying THE “conservative” point of view, please... someone... name just ONE of them who has ever uttered one word of skepticism about the government fairy tale of 9/11 or any role that elements of The CIA or The Mossad might have played in this mass murder on that fateful day.
It simply cannot be done. It cannot be done because each and every single person on this list, the “cream” of conservative talk U.S. radio and television hosts, is really nothing more than a cardboard conservative cutout of a true Nationalist, masquerading as a national conservative commentator. All of them hew to the official government line, explanations and excuses for 9/11; and all of them support the "official" government explanation with the same knee-jerk response for which the Left Wing in America often ridicules the Right Wing -- for saluting the flag and blindly marching off into another undeclared war.
But let’s be fair about this. Even though conservative talk show hosts outnumber liberal talk show hosts, try to find one “liberal” talk show host that has either questioned the government’s’ version of 9/11 or any foreign government’s involvement in those events.
Who do we have here?
o John Stewart
o Keith Olbermann
o Randi Rhodes
o Stephanie Miller
o Bill Maher
o Thom Hartman
o Ed Schultz
In other words, we look at the supposed complete “opposite” end of the political spectrum -- but we end up with the same results. Click your heels, salute the flag, and “Support the Troops.”
Of course, the reality is that the “spectrum” of political opinion represented by these people hardly qualifies as coming from the “opposite” ends of the political spectrum; rather, these people are allowed on the air waves to provide political circus for those who cannot see beyond the limitations of their imagination or the leash of their paymaster.
Nevertheless, the big question remains: why have these people, who make more money than the average American, who have more insight into politics than the average American, who have more time and more responsibility than the average American, who have more news sources and connections than the average American, produced such incredible uniformity of thought on this subject over the air waves? Not even one lone, dissenting voice that dares questions the government’s lies, errors, and omissions?
Why haven’t one of these commentators, whose very job description demands they do more research than simply regurgitating the headlines and stories found in the New York Times or Wall Street Journal, managed to at least have sufficient curiosity to actually read, examine and ponder some of the major, glaring discrepancies in the “official” 9/11 cover-up unearthed by investigators such as architect Richard Gage, Professor Steven Jones, or investigator David Ray Griffin?
What can the matter possibly be? What unspoken blanket assumption has covered the eyes, hearts and minds of all of these people to search for the Truth past the glaring lies and deceit promulgated by government sycophants and and pathetic, knee-jerk “patriots”?
I can think of only one possibility, one which Paul Craig Roberts developed in a recent article about why propaganda trumps truth over and over again in our society.
It revolves around mindsets, and the fear of expressing an opinion that might rock consensus reality. It is the fear that lies in the heart of every man or woman who has ever stood up, alone, in an audience of thousands, to proclaim the complete opposite viewpoint to a speaker on stage who has the full, visible backing of government and corporate society.
It is the fear of being different, of being ridiculed, of being out of the “mainstream” of thought. It is laziness, it is cowardice, it is the worst-case conformity one could ever imagine. For by refusal to at least deeply examine their assumptions, every single one of these “hosts” has abrogated their duty to their audience and to the people of the United States.
So many have already seen through the tissue of lies promoted by our Government-Media complex; yet they still wait for the “vision” of our social commentators on our public airwaves to catch up to the knowledge, discoveries, understanding and outrage of the American public who have done what they have not dared to do -- gone beyond the sound bites, the headlines, the puff opinion pieces, the simplistic patrio-narco bromides which infect the public consciousness and instead, have actually taken the time to read timelines, the testimony of eyewitness, the almost endless discrepancies in the official story, as well as the pronouncements of the heads of the major intelligence agencies of Italy, Russia and Japan.
Let me make it easy for these hosts: 9/11 was an inside job, done by a small faction of traitors in our government with the help of our CIA and The Mossad, perpetrated to end our liberties and provide them with an excuse to justify a U.S. invasion of the Middle East to control the oil.
It was murder; it was treason; it was an assault on all our liberties, and the dead still cry out for JUSTICE. Our talk show hosts are not listening.
Our major talk show hosts across the permitted, truncated, “political spectrum” remain reliable running dog lackeys of the international globalist one-world government power establishment. It is time at least one of them awoke to fulfill their responsibilities and perhaps, their destiny.
L. C. Vincent
by L C Vincent
Quick! Name one major conservative radio or television talk show host who questions the official “U.S. Government Conspiracy Theory” about the events of 9/11. The theory that 19 Arab Hijackers, using box cutters, commandeered 4 passenger jets, slammed two of them into the twin towers of the World Trade Center, causing the collapse of THREE of those towers (let’s not forget building #7), and then crashed another jet into the Pentagon, while the passengers on the last plane overpowered the hijackers, causing it to crash into an empty field in Shanksville, PA. Now quick... name one self-styled “conservative” radio talk show host who has ever expressed even so much as a shadow of doubt about this official government fairy-tale. You can’t.
The irony is that while talk radio is dominated by supposedly conservative talk show hosts, and Fox News dominates the television ratings with its so-called conservative commentators, not one of them has ever so much as raised an eyebrow regarding the thousands of discrepancies between the government’s prefabricated excuses regarding 9/11 versus the mind-numbing black hole of lies which the “official government” version of 9/11 exposes, along with the bottomless pit of depravity skeptical questioning further reveals.
Try it for yourself. Stop if you see one name here that has ever done anything other than provide you with a “salute the flag, click your heels, go kill Muslims and Al Qaeda” propositions to their listeners regarding 9/11:
o Rush Limbaugh
o Bill O’Reilly
o Glenn Beck
o Neil Boortz
o Jerry Doyle
o Michael Savage
o Laura Ingraham
o Laura Crowley
o Mark Levine
o Bob Grant
o Lars Larson
o G. Gordon Liddy
o Phil Hendrie
o Michael Medved
o Don Imus
o Tammy Bruce
In many respects I find this list rather remarkable.
Certainly, these people are not simply of average intelligence; if anything, they are substantially above average. And certainly, these people’s interests are definitely socio-political; their commentary almost always centers around politics, society and current events. Moreover, all of these people have “jobs” that, by their very definition, require them to be not simply “current” about current events, but to discover the real truths that lurk behind the headlines.
So given all of the above, and given that these people dominate our radio and television airwaves while allegedly personifying THE “conservative” point of view, please... someone... name just ONE of them who has ever uttered one word of skepticism about the government fairy tale of 9/11 or any role that elements of The CIA or The Mossad might have played in this mass murder on that fateful day.
It simply cannot be done. It cannot be done because each and every single person on this list, the “cream” of conservative talk U.S. radio and television hosts, is really nothing more than a cardboard conservative cutout of a true Nationalist, masquerading as a national conservative commentator. All of them hew to the official government line, explanations and excuses for 9/11; and all of them support the "official" government explanation with the same knee-jerk response for which the Left Wing in America often ridicules the Right Wing -- for saluting the flag and blindly marching off into another undeclared war.
But let’s be fair about this. Even though conservative talk show hosts outnumber liberal talk show hosts, try to find one “liberal” talk show host that has either questioned the government’s’ version of 9/11 or any foreign government’s involvement in those events.
Who do we have here?
o John Stewart
o Keith Olbermann
o Randi Rhodes
o Stephanie Miller
o Bill Maher
o Thom Hartman
o Ed Schultz
In other words, we look at the supposed complete “opposite” end of the political spectrum -- but we end up with the same results. Click your heels, salute the flag, and “Support the Troops.”
Of course, the reality is that the “spectrum” of political opinion represented by these people hardly qualifies as coming from the “opposite” ends of the political spectrum; rather, these people are allowed on the air waves to provide political circus for those who cannot see beyond the limitations of their imagination or the leash of their paymaster.
Nevertheless, the big question remains: why have these people, who make more money than the average American, who have more insight into politics than the average American, who have more time and more responsibility than the average American, who have more news sources and connections than the average American, produced such incredible uniformity of thought on this subject over the air waves? Not even one lone, dissenting voice that dares questions the government’s lies, errors, and omissions?
Why haven’t one of these commentators, whose very job description demands they do more research than simply regurgitating the headlines and stories found in the New York Times or Wall Street Journal, managed to at least have sufficient curiosity to actually read, examine and ponder some of the major, glaring discrepancies in the “official” 9/11 cover-up unearthed by investigators such as architect Richard Gage, Professor Steven Jones, or investigator David Ray Griffin?
What can the matter possibly be? What unspoken blanket assumption has covered the eyes, hearts and minds of all of these people to search for the Truth past the glaring lies and deceit promulgated by government sycophants and and pathetic, knee-jerk “patriots”?
I can think of only one possibility, one which Paul Craig Roberts developed in a recent article about why propaganda trumps truth over and over again in our society.
It revolves around mindsets, and the fear of expressing an opinion that might rock consensus reality. It is the fear that lies in the heart of every man or woman who has ever stood up, alone, in an audience of thousands, to proclaim the complete opposite viewpoint to a speaker on stage who has the full, visible backing of government and corporate society.
It is the fear of being different, of being ridiculed, of being out of the “mainstream” of thought. It is laziness, it is cowardice, it is the worst-case conformity one could ever imagine. For by refusal to at least deeply examine their assumptions, every single one of these “hosts” has abrogated their duty to their audience and to the people of the United States.
So many have already seen through the tissue of lies promoted by our Government-Media complex; yet they still wait for the “vision” of our social commentators on our public airwaves to catch up to the knowledge, discoveries, understanding and outrage of the American public who have done what they have not dared to do -- gone beyond the sound bites, the headlines, the puff opinion pieces, the simplistic patrio-narco bromides which infect the public consciousness and instead, have actually taken the time to read timelines, the testimony of eyewitness, the almost endless discrepancies in the official story, as well as the pronouncements of the heads of the major intelligence agencies of Italy, Russia and Japan.
Let me make it easy for these hosts: 9/11 was an inside job, done by a small faction of traitors in our government with the help of our CIA and The Mossad, perpetrated to end our liberties and provide them with an excuse to justify a U.S. invasion of the Middle East to control the oil.
It was murder; it was treason; it was an assault on all our liberties, and the dead still cry out for JUSTICE. Our talk show hosts are not listening.
Our major talk show hosts across the permitted, truncated, “political spectrum” remain reliable running dog lackeys of the international globalist one-world government power establishment. It is time at least one of them awoke to fulfill their responsibilities and perhaps, their destiny.
L. C. Vincent
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)