Sunday, October 10, 2010

Why I enjoyed Avatar...

An ageless film with messages in multiple dimensions!

I have seen Avatar twice, and enjoyed it even more the second time thru.  Eventually,  I questioned myself specifically why  I enjoyed this film, even tho it was a fantasy. Beyond the adventure and amazing computer generated scenes and characters, these are the main factors why I found Avatar appealing, in no particular order:

o It provided a vividly realistic portrayal of our military; essentially, the humanity is drilled out of all of our military, especially the Army,  until they become "fighting machines" who only live to obey orders without giving any thought towards what goal their actions contribute, nor to the needless suffering they inflict upon the innocent. Unfortunately, this has been the case since the early 1800's, when the military was used to clear American Indians from their land, up unto our Imperialist period, when we invaded the Philippines and Panama, and the later period from the early 1900's onward, when our military was used for native pacification in Central and South America to secure American food, oil and mineral interests for American businesses. As Smedley Butler, the most highly decorated Marine in the history of the U.S. stated, "War is a Racket."

o It realistically portrayed the non-caring, anti-life, parasitic business mentality driving our military from behind the scenes

o It portrayed the physical macho mentality of the Top Gung Ho Marine, who lived to battle and kill. Killing was so much a part of his body that his mind could not grasp anything beyond his "mission" and "objective" defined by his parasitic corporate bosses

o It showed how individuals within the military (the female helicopter pilot who turns around rather than fire her rockets at the Na'vi) could make real, ethical choices and decisions based upon their individual values and their own conscience rather than just "following orders" and then submerging her values to that of the herd.

o It showed that successful resistance to exploitation required the acquisition of weaponry and communications technology roughly on the same level as that of The Na'vi's oppressors. Although the theft of the arms locker from the main headquarters by the helicopter was a very brief part of the film, the Na'vi's successful rebellion against the Earth forces could not have been achieved with their original technology of spears, bows and arrows.

o It showed how the hero, Jake Sully, was able to grow to an entirely new level of perception by exposure and openness to an entirely different set of values; not simplistic "Nature Worship" but rather the realization that all the inhabitants of every planet (including the animals) are part of the chain of life of that planet and are organically and spiritually linked together.

o It portrayed the highest male/female relationship: mating and bonding for life.

o It illustrated via the floating, glowing orbs and the living root tree that there is a spiritual dimension to our physical life which our rational mind cannot penetrate thru logic and reason, but can only access thru observation and intuition;

o It showed how Jake Sully's relationship with Neytiri inspired him to grow beyond his own self-imposed limitations, and how Neytiri's relationship with Jack also inspired her to grow beyond hers.

o It showed every aspect of Neytiri, from her tenderness, her compassion, her intuition, her loyalty, as well as her ferocious, fierce Will to fight to the death to protect those she loved. To me, she portrayed Woman in her complete fullness.

o It showed how Neytiri's love for Jake transcended species; Jake never betrayed his "race;" rather, Jake redeemed and expanded his humanity by his love for Neytiri, just as Neytiri did by her love for Jake, even when she saw Jake's human, crippled body. It was Jake's heart and life force that always attracted Neytiri, not his envelope. She responded to Jake's being rather than his body. This was, in my eyes, an accurate portrayal of what love truly is and is meant to be... a force which redeems, transforms and uplifts us beyond our own veils...

L C Vincent

Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.

Saturday, October 9, 2010

The Hidden Agenda of "The War of the Worlds"

First Illuminati Electronic Mass Media Psy-Op -- Orson Welles 1938’s Radio Broadcast of “The War of the Worlds.”

The original radio broadcast of “War of the Worlds” in 1938, which was noted for generating “accidental” and “unfortunate” panic and hysteria throughout the United States when listeners tuned in to what they thought was a real invasion by Martians, was the first electronic mass media psychological operation (psy-op) of The Illuminati, funded directly by the Rockefeller Foundation funneled thru The Princeton Radio Project, and guided at every stage by members of the Council on Foreign Relations to study the American public’s reaction to a hoaxed false panic situation.

Actor Orson Welles, the creator of the program and the “news announcer” of this infamous broadcast, later apologized for the hysteria this radio show created. Few people realize that this broadcast was the opening salvo of mass societal psychological manipulation by the paid minions of The Illuminati to advance their plans for a New World Order,  funded by the Rockefellers and guided by CFR members Frank Stanton and psychologist Dr. Hadley Cantril.

Operating on a grant from the Rockefellers, The Princeton University Radio Project, under supervision of psychologist Dr. Paul F. Lazarsfeld, along with Frank Stanton (later head of CBS Radio and Television) and Dr. Hadley Cantril hired Orson Welles to adapt H. G. Wells’ fiction book “The War of the Worlds” to the radio format in order to study the behavior of citizens under panic conditions.  Not only was the stress and panic of a fictional Martian invasion the night before Halloween anticipated by its producers; it was purposely crafted to create terror so as to judge how American society and groups of people within its citizenry would react under the pressure of an imminent attack by creatures from another planet.

This very first electronic mass media “psy-op” was heard by 6 million people, 1,700,000 of whom believed the broadcast to be genuine, and 1,200,000 of whom were frightened enough to take action -- either by running away or preparing to fight the invaders. Later, when the broadcast was revealed to be simply a dramatic exercise which had been mistakenly taken seriously by over a million people, an apparently repentant Welles apologized repeatedly over the course of the next few weeks in newspapers and radio broadcasts for any accidents which may have occurred as a result. The idea of using an interrupting news-bulletin in the middle of what seemed like regular music programming was deemed excessively cruel, manipulative and deceptive.

What the general public did not understand, and what even fewer people guessed, was that this cruel manipulation had been purposely planned to produce precisely this effective level of stress and terror by its CFR promoters working for the Rockefellers and their Illuminati masters. It has been said that Welles even received death threats -- not by members of the general public, but through the agents of the Rockefellers should he ever reveal publicly that the “unforeseen” reaction to this broadcast was precisely what it's perpetrators had hoped to achieve in order to analyze, demographically, psycho-graphically and statistically, the reaction of the citizenry of the United States.

This secret test, financed and directed by The Rockefellers and guided by their minions from the Council on Foreign Relations (both Stanton and Cantril were members) used it to judge susceptibility to belief influenced by worry, phobias, fatalism and the fear of war.   Members of the general public were later interviewed and their reactions to the broadcast were paired against such variables as religion, education, year and make of car, reading materials, job security, etc. Cantril later wrote a paper entitled: “The Invasion from Mars -- A Study in the Psychology of Panic.” Cantril’s study examined the power of the radio broadcast media and its effects upon a population under the direct influence of fear.

So despite Orson Welles many public pronouncement and apologies to the general public for the terror, panic and confusion his adaptation and broadcast of H. G. Wells’ “War of the Worlds” had caused, the covert reality is that the Rockefellers and members of the Council on Foreign Relations actively sought to panic members of the general public to gauge their reaction to a horrific, frightful scenario -- one which was false, yet had been deliberately constructed to be perceived to be real, genuinely terrifying and life-threatening.

This first electronic stress test was just in time to anticipate the dawn of the age of television. Only two years later, again with Rockefeller Foundation money, Cantril established the Office of Public Opinion Research at Princeton. Among the studies conducted by the OPOR was analyzing the effectiveness of propaganda produced by the forerunner of the CIA, known as the OSS (Office of Strategic Services).

During WWII, Edward R. Murrow, also a CFR member, was assisted by money from the Rockefeller Foundation and Dr. Cantril to establish the Princeton Listening Center, whose purpose was to spy on Nazi radio propaganda and judge its effectiveness.

From this project sprang the FBIS (Foreign Broadcast Intelligence Service) which eventually became the US Information Agency, used by the National Security Council as its chief disseminator of propaganda after WWII.

After leaving CBS, Frank Stanton became the Chairman of the RAND Corporation, an extremely influential government think tank, which researched among other topics, mass brainwashing of an unsuspecting public through the mass media.

At the end of the original radio broadcast of “The War of the Worlds” the announcer (Welles) is no longer heard; instead, the voice of a field artillery commander comes on the air, repeatedly calling the code: “2X 2L calling CQ... 2X 2L calling CQ... is there anyone on the air?”

The “2 X” can easily be thought of as a “double cross” (two X’s or crosses); the “2L” is easier -- To Hell. Or Together, “Double Cross to Hell.” Quite an appropriate way to end a fake broadcast featuring a hoaxed alien invasion from Mars created to terrify the citizenry of the United States in order to measure their reactions to artificially induced stress, like laboratory rats under the microscope of the Council of Foreign Relations for their hidden masters -- The Illuminati.


In 1917, Marxist John Dewey was the first political person to publicly promote the threat of an invasion from outer space when he spoke these words: “"Some one remarked that the best way to unite all the nations on this globe would be an attack from some other planet.  In the face of such an alien enemy, people would respond with a sense of their unity of interest and purpose." John Dewey, New York 1917.

Decades later, President Ronald Reagan made a similar observation at the United Nations when he said: “"In our obsession with antagonisms of the moment, we often forget how much unites all the members of humanity. Perhaps we need some outside, universal threat to make us realize this common bond. I occasionally think how quickly our differences would vanish if we were facing an alien threat from outside this world." - President Ronald Reagan, in a speech made to the 42nd General Assembly of the United Nations, Sept. 21, 1987

Seventy years and two World Wars separate those statements; yet the people who would take advantage of the mass media and use it to terrorize an unsuspecting population stand ready to again promote a similar scenario. The radio broadcast of “The War of the Worlds” may just be a precursor to another fake outer space alien invasion created thru “Project Blue Beam.”

One wonders how many people will panic and die needlessly to satisfy the blood lusts of The Illuminati should this more chillingly realistic scenario transpire at the end of 2012!

L C Vincent

Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.

CIA Runs American TV Network News From Day One for the Illuminati

There is No "News"; It's All Programming!

After WWII, with the emergence of three rival television networks, each with their own news departments, most Americans would have argued that the new age of television would grant them a multiplicity of sources and viewpoints. They would point to the three competing television networks: ABC, CBS and NBC, as proof that the capitalist system of competition worked to provide them with the latest news, and that their respective news departments were working to scoop each other to bring the American public the most honest, comprehensive and in depth analysis of the stories behind the day’s headlines.

Yet from their very inception, each of the American television networks have been guided by men who were a product of and beholden to America’s intelligence agencies. From the beginning, the men who ran ABC, CBS and NBC as well as those sitting on their boards of directors, had the deepest ties to the CIA, the Council on Foreign Relations, Rothschild Banks and the Rockefeller Foundation. From the very beginning, the American television networks and American news media have been a product that has been created, shaped and molded to promote the aims of the globalists and their New World Order, guided by the “light” of the Illuminati.

Three Networks, One Master

According to the late investigative reporter Eustace Mullins, CBS Chairman William S. Paley was both conduit and operative for the CIA. Many directors of CBS had CIA ties. NBC and ABC Television networks were also riddled with CIA influenced directors with links to this U.S. intelligence agency. A pattern of interlocking directorships reveals these patterns in multiple variations. Linkages such as multiple directors of various Federal Reserve Bank branches, directors to numerous banks with Rothschild and JP Morgan connections, and links to Kuhn Loeb &; Co., First City Bancorp and The Institute of Strategic Studies in London, as well as various Rockefeller foundations and memberships in the Council on Foreign Relations, were and are commonplace.

So while the illusion of 3 competing television networks with three apparently independent, competing news departments remain the public facade of television journalism, the reality is that the interlocking directorates and board memberships of multiple international businesses clearly illustrate that the members of the boards of directors of all three networks partake in numerous symbiotic and parallel financial investments, which point to inescapable, even severe conflicts of interest.

Yet without these overlapping network directorships heavily larded with CIA - Rockefeller - Morgan - Rothschild - CFR linkages, the CIA made a concerted effort from the start of the electronic information age to not simply shade and tilt news stories to their liking, but to actively recruit reporters and journalists as CIA assets to be used to quash stories they wished ignored, or to distort and selectively bias the presentation of stories they wished to use for their own purposes.

Making a “Mock” ery of The News

The code name for this work, appropriately enough, was “Operation Mockingbird.” A mockingbird is a creature with the natural gift to mimic or mirror whatever song another bird makes. So, too, the CIA's “embedded” reporters, editors and owners would mirror whatever particular slant The Agency wished the general public to perceive, or the opposite: they would instruct their sources to bury or ignore stories which did not serve their purpose.

According to author Steve Kangas, in his article “Anatomy of the Overclass”, the CIA recruited 25 media organizations and over 400 reporters and journalists to do their bidding since the late 1940’s. This was revealed to the Church Committee in 1975, and many felt that The Agency’s reach went even deeper. The list of assets and operatives included:

* William Paley (President, CBS Network)
* ABC Network
* NBC Network
* Philip and Katharine Graham (Publishers, Washington Post)
* Henry Luce (Publisher, Time and Life magazine)
* Arthur Hays Sulzberger (Publisher, N.Y. Times)
* Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star)
* Hal Hendrix (Pulitzer Prize winner, Miami News)
* Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal)
* James Copley (Copley News Services)
* Joseph Harrison (Editor, Christian Science Monitor)
* C.D. Jackson (Fortune)
* Walter Pincus (Reporter, Washington Post)
* Associated Press
* United Press International
* Reuters
* Hearst Newspapers
* Scripps-Howard
* Newsweek magazine
* Mutual Broadcasting System
* Miami Herald
* New York Herald-Tribune

Perhaps it would have been more prudent if the Church committee had instead asked which news organizations the CIA had not subverted; it would surely have produced a shorter list!

In the case of the Washington Post, “...owner Philip Graham was a military intelligence officer in World War II, and later became close friends with CIA figures like Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Desmond FitzGerald and Richard Helms. He inherited the Post by marrying Katherine Graham, whose father owned it.” Graham was reported to have committed suicide in 1963.

Another example of the CIA’s reach: According to Kangas, “...Sig Mickelson was a CIA asset the entire time he was president of CBS News from 1954 to 1961. Later he went on to become president of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, two major outlets of CIA propaganda.”

But even worse -- the CIA actually “owned” (thru proxy) several media outlets, including Capital Cities, whose owner, William Casey, later became the Director of the CIA under Ronald Reagan. Capital Cities later bought the entire ABC Television Network.

To illustrate the CIA’s amazingly thorough and pervasive control over the flow of information, just consider this one amazing tidbit. Nearly everyone alive with any knowledge of the John Kennedy assassination knows about “The Zapruder  Film," the film shot by Abraham Zapruder, which purports to show JFK being hit by one bullet to the head.

Forgetting, for the moment, that the Zapruder film has been recently revealed to have been altered and rearranged via computer animation before ever being made available to the general public, this writer was amazed to discover while doing research for this story that there are actually numerous “other” films of the JFK assassination, ALL OF WHICH remain locked in the vaults of various news organizations, and which have never seen the public light of day. As revealed by author Richard E. Sprague, in “The Taking of America, 1-2-3”, these films include:

The Dorman movie -  Private
The Robert Hughes movie -  Private
The David Weigman TV footage - NBC
The Malcolm Couch TV footage - ABC
The John Martin movie -  Private

The question that immediately comes to mind upon realizing that ALL of this footage has been so suppressed that its very existence is unknown to the general public, begs the question: WHY? The answer is equally obvious -- it’s airing would provide proof positive of a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, a conspiracy which no one would any longer dismiss as a “theory.”

There is probably no better example of the influence and weight the CIA can bring to bear on unwanted news than the story of San Jose’ (California) Mercury-News reporter Gary Webb.

In 1996, “crack” reporter Gary Webb ran a voluminously detailed three part article entitled “Dark Alliance”, exposing the CIA’s involvement in the importation and distribution of crack cocaine throughout the Los Angeles ghettos, while also supplying the notorious Cripps and Bloods gangs with drugs to distribute throughout America.

As Susan Bell of the “Independent/UK” newspaper wrote: “Webb's pieces were not dealing with nameless peasants slaughtered in some distant republic, but demonstrated a clear link between the CIA and the suppliers of the gangs delivering crack to the ghetto of Watts, in South Central Los Angeles.” Not surprisingly, there was very little “pick up” of the story by other “independent” news agencies and organizations., many of which the CIA controlled.

Shaping Perception by Casting Doubt and Aspersions

Despite meticulous research and multiple source verification, Webb and the Mercury-News were mercilessly attacked by The Washington Post, the NY Times and The Los Angeles Times. According to author Kangas, The Washington Post attack article was written by the long time CIA journalist, Walter Pincus.

Eventually, under this savage barrage of criticism, the Mercury-News first distanced itself from Webb’s series of articles, then disowned them as not being properly substantiated. Webb lost his job at the Mercury-News and became a freelancer.

On December 13, 2004, Pulitzer Prize winning reporter Gary Webb was found in his apartment shot dead, an apparent “suicide” according to the coroner -- although the coroner’s report did note that Webb had to shoot himself TWICE to get the job done...   Of course....!

Entertain, Distract, Divide and Conquer

Besides the repression and burial of disturbing stories, distraction and diversion are the other aspects of the Zionist--Illuminati game plan as revealed in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Nowhere can this be found more prevalent than on our network “news” nightly reports, which are often filled with stories about sports stars, movie stars, media celebrities and scandals. A prime example of this ploy was the The O.J. Simpson television-news “tsunami” of his murder trial which was used to take the heat off of many of Bill Clinton’s constitutional transgressions by moving the spotlight away from Clinton to O.J.

Conveniently, our electronic news media always seem preoccupied with some scandal or other that often seems to coincidentally emerge at the exact same time when news of an embarrassing political nature vies for public attention. As I write this, the “saga” of actress Lindsey Lohan’s 90 day jail sentence for parole violation, and her tearful courtroom entreaties, has effectively bumped the Obama administration’s decision not to prosecute members of the Black Panther Party in a clear cut case of voter intimidation outside of a voting place, despite the fact that members of the Panthers have stated in a recording that White “Cracker” babies should be killed . The networks have their priorities.... and keeping us informed about events which actually have a bearing upon our lives is not one of them.

The Hydra Speaks with One Voice

To anyone who seriously wishes to see the difference between American “news” reporting of a controversial, political event versus reportage from outside this country, the easiest method is to select one internationally important story and see what is revealed and suppressed by reading the same story on the internet from multiple news sources around the world. One quickly gathers the essence of the information that our “handlers” would prefer us not to know. Perhaps the most obvious example of this recent phenomenon is the story concerning the Israeli interdiction (assault) of the relief ship convoy to Gaza.

Other than internet sources from other countries, one could hardly find a “discouraging word” from any U.S. media outlet or commentator, whether on television, radio, newspapers or news magazines. The consensus was brutally simple: Israel was correct to “protect” itself by boarding these supply ships with armed commandos dangling from helicopters in the middle of the night and killing more than 10 unarmed people, while confiscating all recording devices for good measure. Surveying the American national media about this story, one could ONLY conclude that there could possibly be NO OTHER side than Israel’s until one read internet reports from other countries citing the logical and inhuman inconsistencies ignored by Israel’s American media propaganda outlets.

And so it goes. It should come as no surprise, then, that Senator Joseph Lieberman has introduced a bill in the U.S. Senate to enable any president to turn off the Internet for “national security” purposes. Indeed, as Lieberman has pointed out, China already has this ability and we should too! Right. China should be our “model” for news reportage and in-depth analysis, and when a news story is too “controversial” then just shut off the ‘net for the sake of “national security.”  What could be simpler?

As we face the ever further restrictions on our speech, assembly, press freedoms (Supreme Court nominee Ellen Kagan could not even bring herself to admit that the First Amendment prohibits government censorship), it behooves us to realize that this continued assault on our right to know goes hand in hand with The Illuminati’s plan to create an ever further dumbed down citizenry, too distracted and stupefied by meaningless stories of celebrity and drama to discern the critically important stories which crucially impact our God-given freedoms and our way of life.

The time may soon come when the right to even question public officials will be looked upon as a “terrorist assault” and asking embarrassing questions of the political elite may be codified as “hate speech” thanks to the Illuminati’s continued corruption of our thought and language, along with their control and shaping of the flow of what might be considered “news.”

As guardians of the heritage of our Founding Fathers, we must make sure that this is the one dawning day which will never cast its light upon our future.

L C Vincent

Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.

Behold The Maitreyea: The Anti-Christ Cometh

A Perverse Trinity of Anti-Christs Await Us

His path has been in preparation for well over a thousand years; and now it appears that events are rapidly escalating throughout the world, culminating in omens, signs and portents mentioned in the Christian Bible heralding the arrival of the Anti-Christ.

In truth, the preparation for his arrival through the auspices of the Illuminati has been generations in the making.

Both Helena Petrovna Blavatsky, one of the founders of the Theosophical Society and author of “Isis Unveiled” (1877) and “The Secret Doctrine” (1888); and Alice A. Bailey, predicted The Maitreya’s arrival in our century.

Blavatsky , whose work had an enormous impact in spiritualist circles, was reputedly contacted by the master Moraya in 1851, who advised and guided her in the establishment of the Theosophical Society in 1875.

Alice A. Bailey (1880-1949), later became influential member of the Theosophical Society, and claimed to be in direct contact with ascended masters who told her of the coming of the great world master -- known as The Maitreya, the new Christ, earlier in the last century.

Bailey went on to found the highly influential Lucis Trust in 1922, (originally named the Lucifer Trust before bowing to the gods of camouflage and which now include such luminaries as David Rockefeller, Henry Kissinger, Paul Volcker and George Schultz) and thru her contact with the hidden master Djwahl Khul, Bailey claimed that humanity’s new master in the form of The Maitreya would once again incarnate upon the face of the Earth.

Nearer to our own time line, a man named Benjamin Creme (born 1922) a student of both Blavatsky’s and Bailey’s teachings, fervently studied the predictions of both women before announcing to the world in 1959 that a hidden master had announced to him that The Maitreya -- the New World Teacher -- would soon incarnate upon Earth and lead the world into a new Golden Age of knowledge and peace.

Creme founded yet another trust, Share International Foundation, to prepare the way for the coming of this new world teacher. Creme has stated that The Maitreya has actually incarnated as an individual and is now living in London. According to Creme, he has entered into this world via a “self created body” in 1977 which, it would seem, was done to put him one over on Jesus Christ, who had to rely upon at least one earthly parent for physical manifestation.

Further, claims Creme, the Maitreya’s first public appearance will be heralded by geologic, social and economic catastrophes, including a worldwide stock market crash. The Maitreyea will then publicly appear and on a “Day of Declaration” where he will be able to psychically communicate to every human being on the planet at the same time, announcing that he has arrived to liberate mankind from they tyranny of capitalism, greed and corruption.

Make no bones about it, The Maitreya, according to Benjamin Creme, has a very lowly opinion of the United States and capitalism in general, considering our economic system the embodiment of greed and theft, in contrast to the selfless cooperation, peace and harmony which a loving socialist style society would impose upon world citizens.

Of course, The Maitreya’s appearance will signal the need for One World Global Government, as the solution to mankind’s problems of war, famine and pestilence. At the same time, the wealth of the world will be extracted by those select families who own and run The Federal Reserve and other central banking institutions around the world, creating a layer of equal poverty, hunger and desperation around the planet. The only solution to these unpleasantries will be the acceptance of The Maitreya’s authority as God’s messenger, and for whom we should now gratefully accept our new lot in life -- one of equal misery and pestilence in homage to our superiors.

Others, however, think that we might perhaps more rightly consider The Maitreya to be the messenger of The Illuminati Incarnate. Perhaps this new World Teacher, who is said to regard Jesus Christ as his messenger (!), is nothing more than Old Scratch, His Satanic Majesty, The Devil made Flesh, the Anti-Christ on Earth.

There is yet another ambassador, of sorts, for The Maitreya. In December of 1973, “Rael” a French journalist, (real name Claude Vorilhon) claimed to have met a being from space, who stated his purpose was to establish an embassy on Earth for the harmonious cooperation of all humans who were now ready to explore cosmic consciousness. Eagerly accepting both the message and the aliens’ conferral of leadership, Vorilhon established Raelism -- a religion based on UFOs and a certain species of space aliens who claim they created all intelligent life on Earth, specifically humans, in their own likeness.

This space ambassador, who according to Rael, could walk down any street in Japan and blend right into the crowd, told him that humanity was designed by them and in their image. Finally, he claimed, our planet had evolved to a place where messengers such as Jesus had prepared humanity to accept the next phase in human evolution, the phase marked by the appearance of The Maitreya.

As part of their discipline, Raelians speak against the use of drugs, tobacco, coffee and limit alcohol to moderate levels. They are however, very much into the refinement of erotic pleasure and hold liberal views on the expression of sexuality. They deny the existence of a human soul and a supernatural god; instead, they strive to seek the transmission and implantation of one’s mind and experience into a new, disease free body.

In 1991, The Raelians attempted to establish a space port in Israel for the reception of ambassadors from off planet. Their request was denied, perhaps because the Raelian symbol is a six pointed Star of David with a Swastika in the middle of it. Others claim the Realian cult is both fascistic and racist, as they have stated that only those who are at least 10% above average intelligence have any right to vote as part of the electorate.

Besides believing that humanity was designed and created by extraterrestrials, Raelians believe in human cloning, “Geniocracy” (the governing of ‘The People’ by an elite of geniuses) and the coming of The Maitreya, the great “world leader” and “world teacher.” But not to be outdone, Rael has declared himself to be “The Maitreya of the West.”

As we approach the year of 2012, which Hollywood and others have warned us about in Mayan prophecy as the potential “end of the world,” there seems to be no dearth of candidates one might label as the new anti-Christ. Whether one chooses Benjamin Creme or Claude Vorilhon as direct incarnations of the Maitreya, or one prefers the more traditional devil in the form of the self-incarnated Maitreya who allegedly appeared in Kenya in 1988 before deciding that London was a more fitting abode for a demon of his stature, it cannot be denied that Creme and “Rael” are in the same line presaging the arrival of the new cosmic teacher first mentioned by Blavatsky and Bailey over a century ago.

Moreover, this new “Maitreyea” has allegedly appeared to thousands of influential world leaders, including Mikhail Gorbachev. During such appearances, he supposedly performs ‘miracles” to convince the skeptical that he is, indeed, the new world teacher. Yet even a cursory reading of certain biblical passages would convince us that The Maitreya, should he actually exist, could just as easily be the anti-Christ predicted in The Bible, and that his wondrous deeds are another illusion to mislead the gullible down the path to Satan and the establishment of a New World Order and One World Government which -- according to both Creme and “Rael” -- is just what humanity needs at this time of environmental trials and economic tribulations.

One thing is certain -- the cosmic “timing” of the Maitreya is certainly on schedule, whether one looks at the current near economic collapse of all major world economies, the catastrophic oil leak in the gulf of Mexico, the increasing volcanic and tectonic activity, and the predicted solar flares said to be coming in late 2012 and early 2013 which may disrupt all electronic communication on Earth (bye bye internet and cell phones).

Couple all these natural phenomenon with Biblical predictions, Mayan prophecies, Hollywood disaster flicks, and verified prophets heralding the arrival of a new “spiritual” Earth Teacher, and one can only conclude that The Illuminati have all the cards necessary to convince the gullible that The Maitreya will be appearing to take our planet under his beneficent wing, for the benefit of the elite of the New World Order.

L C Vincent

Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.

Beware Fake Alien Invasion Threat from Space

Wernher Von Braun's Warning to Us All...

Dr. Wernher Von Braun was a top ranking SS officer who was also the head of the Nazi rocket program for Adolf Hitler during WWII. Von Braun was brought to America after the War, like other top Nazi scientists, because our government considered his knowledge and expertise too vital an asset to fall into the hands of our enemies.
When Dr. Von Braun and his colleagues crossed the Atlantic after World War II, they brought with them a wealth of information they had gleaned from their work with other top Nazi scientists. Thru his association with General Hans Kammler, Von Braun’s boss, Von Braun may have been privy to other SS scientists' work on anti gravity propulsion vehicles strongly rumored to have been developed and refined in Germany at the end of the war. Based on the information he later shared with his colleague, Dr. Carol Rosin, it would certainly seem so.
As the leash on Von Braun and his colleagues gradually relaxed during the mid 50’s and early 60’s during America’s quest to land the first man on the moon, Von Braun’s access to NASA’s secret programs and other mysteries behind its public facade grew in scope. Insiders close to Von Braun revealed that he now saw the “big picture” regarding the true goals of America's space program and how the military-industrial complex was manipulating it according to a hidden agenda.
Dr. Carol Rosin first met Wernher Von Braun in February of 1974. It was at this time, shortly before his death in 1977, that Von Braun confided to Dr. Rosin the details of this hidden space agenda that had been contrived decades earlier and which would be gradually loosed upon an unsuspecting world during the decades after his death.
Inviting her into his office, Von Braun stunned Dr. Rosin by describing this agenda, point for point, as well as describing in detail exactly where it was all leading.
According to Dr. Rosin (see multiple videos on YouTube and other places) Von Braun gave her one supreme assignment: to stop the weaponization of space.
According to Von Braun, space based weapons, later known as the “Star Wars” program, were to be publicly promoted as our space “shield” against the evil Russians. Then they would be promoted as our defense against terrorists from Third World countries (‘rogue’ nations or ‘nations of concern’), then their necessity would be justified as protection against asteroids and meteors, and the “last card,” the final justification, would be their use against an extraterrestrial threat from outer space.

Von Braun told Carol that she would begin to notice a certain “spin” on the news, which would illustrate the need to build space-based weaponry because our enemies “might” have these weapons, so our intelligence community would proceed on the assumption that they DO have these weapons. As we now know, this is exactly how the Star Wars program transpired.
According to Wernher Von Braun, all of these space based weapons to protect us from these publicly announced threats were all lies. Von Braun cited the reality of nuclear suitcase bombs being available even then, as well as chemical, viral, bacterial and biological terror weapons against which these space based weapons would be useless.
More importantly, Von Braun also told Dr. Rosin that even in 1974, we already had the technology to build anti-gravity vehicles and entire transportation systems which did not require so-called ‘fossil’ fuels but used “beams” of energy, thereby eliminating all pollution from these sources permanently. Apparently, he had seen anti-gravity vehicles with his own eyes in Germany before the end of the war, as well as their continued development at other secret technology sites afterwards.
Von Braun further told Dr. Rosin that we had the ability to transform our “war” based military/industrial complex into a space and energy industry to the benefit of all of humanity. He told Dr. Rosin that we had the capability of building entirely nonpolluting technologies to run the planet using this same limitless energy, and end the arms race without dislocating the jobs associated with it, thereby transitioning our world into a new industrial paradigm while ushering in an era of peace, plenty and prosperity for everyone.
More than 30 years ago, Von Braun declared that we had the ability to live in harmony with our fellow man, and to provide more jobs and profits on this planet than at any other time in our history by bringing these nonpolluting technologies into public use, thereby creating the products and service which could be applied to directly solving the problems of this planet.
Of course, what is equally interesting is what Dr. Von Braun left unsaid. If space base weapons technologies are not really being developed to protect the U.S. and its allies against rogue nations and their weapons; if, indeed, such weapons are useless against suit case nuclear bombs, and chemical, biological and viral weapons, then exactly why are they being developed? Could select populations of resistors, whether nation-states or isolated groups opposed to the coming New World Order, be singled out and eliminated?
This is certainly one possibility. Yet another possibility is that such space based weapons will be part of the “smoke and mirrors” light show designed to terrify the population of the Earth when “Project Blue Beam” debuts, with its false presentation of an alien invasion.
If Dr. Werhner Von Braun already knew that anti-gravitic technology existed at such a level of development in 1974 that its public employment could transform and revolutionize our world had The Powers That Be allowed it to be introduced into our lives, then we must also conclude that part of the coming alien “light show” and invasion scenario scheduled to frighten us into the loving arms of a One World Government and a New World Order utilizing the technology of Project Blue Beam is based upon anti-gravitic “alien” craft under the planetary control of the unseen Illuminati hand which silently moves under the radar of the world’s staged media.
Dr. Carol Rosin revealed this information before the national press in Washington, D.C. on October 24, 2007, when she said that she was willing to make the exact same statement under oath to Congress. Of course, you have never heard about this statement, or Dr. Rosin, unless you stumbled across the video of her speech on YouTube and other sites.   

Do you wonder why?

L C VIncent

Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.

My View of the Coronation

(*note: the following was written the day after B.O. was anointed as President. Thought lost or erased, its recent discovery in my hard drive provoked mirth and wry amusement. It is reproduced for your pleasure, or at least the pleasure of those with similar sympathies).
Barack Ascends to the Throne of America

I watched the coronation yesterday and noted that the "cult of personality" is now in full swing and growing in this country.   Blind adulation may not necessarily lead to a dictatorship, but I fear such uncritical clamor can be used for purposes that will end up bordering on the dictatorial.

What difference does it make at the end of the day if the person making these unilateral decisions was "popularly" elected, if his fiats are accepted and acted upon as law? That is not the form of government I was born and raised to think exists in Washington DC, but more and more, thru increased media "glamification", it becomes increasingly difficult for the average person to perceive anything other than a "larger than life" demi-god-like figure named Obama to whom people will turn to for inspiration and answers -- but based on what achievements, accomplishments, and life experience?

I suppose the precursor of this Presidential Coronation was the Obaminator's acceptance of the presidential nomination at the Democrat National Committee, where he walked thru the Greek columns (what, no laurel victory wreath? How could He forget??) to the stage past a throng of cheering acolytes. The only thing missing from yesterday's Presidential Coronation was to have Barack walk in long, white flowing robes and bare feet on top of the water of The Washington Monument's reflecting pool, and then levitate to the top of the stage to be transfigured before us on live TV beamed by satellites around the world. Yes, that would be a fitting "cap" to the narcissism Obama seems to possess in spades, and it would have also substantiated the idolatry swimming in the eyes of his sycophantic admirers.

* * * * *

 I love my country; I detest our politicians. They no longer represent the people or the citizens of this country, but only the most powerful lobbies and special interests, especially the financial interests.

We witness corporate America having to crawl on bended knee to ask for subsidies (companies that have defined American enterprise and have employed tens of thousands of people directly and indirectly for nearly a century); we see them subject to humiliation and extreme public scrutiny of their finances that have been eroded by "free trade" (not Fair Trade!) policies instituted by Washington politicians and lobbyists. These companies are the backbone of our economy; they actually make useful products rather than create "mortgage backed securities" and derivatives built upon nothing more than speculation and gambling packaged as Grade A paper. And yet all the financial sector has to do is cry crocodile tears and hold out their hands and they receive all the cash they require and then some, with no public scrutiny, no cries of conflict of interest, no oversight, no paper trail, no accusations of theft and fraud, no accountability, no responsibility, no 'quid pro quo', no nothing, know nothing! They can have ALL the money they want, right now, right from our pockets and the pockets of our children, their children, and their children, down to the next ten generations, with no questions asked or expected.

Yet when politicians are beholden for financial contributions to get elected in order to continue to bolster their egos which constantly need TV exposure, rather than enjoy the earned gratification and the heartfelt satisfaction of running a sound fiscal ship based on constitutional principles and sound money as defined by our Constitution, we end up with the ‘wanna be’ movie stars masquerading as politicians that we see in DC today.

Politically, I've voted Democrat, Republican and Independent. I vote for the person and never the party. But voting, democracy, and the so-called principle of "one man, one vote" was actually established to enshrine the sham of fair elections and provide rubes with the pretense that they actually have some control on the levers of power.

We are supposed to have a "Constitutional Republic", not a Democracy.   Our Founding Fathers despised democracy as just one temporary step above mob rule. That is one of the reasons why the only people originally allowed to vote had to be land owners. Our Founding Fathers rightly judged that only landowners had a physical stake in the results of the electoral process. But to listen to our pundits and politicians massage our history, "Democracy" -- writ in large gold letters -- is the salvation of the Earth. And moreover, it is now our fundamental right to impose democracy on every culture we choose to do so -- as long as that culture has access to sufficient reserves of oil, precious minerals, metals and other natural resources.

Yet in our last two “democratic” elections, our politicians and puppet masters were not content with simply swaying the masses thru mass media propaganda. They went one step further -- to the actual control of the voting process (and the results!) thru the remote reprogramming of the Diebold touch-screen video fantasy voting machines (via satellite!), with no paper trail.   Stalin would be so proud, so envious!

* * * * *

 Nevertheless, I yearn for true financial, ethical and spiritual renewal based upon the eternal principles upon which this country was founded. But I fear it is not to be, at least not in my lifetime. The grip of the media masters, and the media-political-military-educational complex is far too thorough and complete, the educational "process" far too debilitated, to expect anything other than further societal drift, theft, corruption and manipulation as we slide towards Socialism.

Of course, I realize that many of the electorate voted with the "hope" that yet another vapid re-run of George Bush I and Bush-Lite II would not materialize (two political hacks who would have both been relegated to parking cars had not grandfather Prescott enjoyed political clout); therefore the electorate decided to "change" America's course with the "hope" that their election of a slick empty suit would be better, in the long run, than the their previous election of a dyslexic bi-sexual shit-kicker.

Yet I know I must pause and put all this in its proper perspective.   I must realize that for Barack, the Presidency of the United States is merely a “stepping stone” to truly greater glory; the head of the United Nations or some form of new global government comes to mind.

Nevertheless one can only hope that the monumental hubris and arrogance which seems to drip from the very pores of this curious media creature will come back to haunt our presidential silver-tongued animatronic mannequin.
Even the best actors can be at a loss for words when their script runs out or the teleprompter stops rolling.

L C Vincent


Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.

Musings on the Power of Music

My Musical Goals Beyond...
I want to open people to the potential locked away in the music they love to transport them to another place, another space in time.
By focusing on the beauty and purity of music, we can open people to an inward path towards the initiation of beauty and truth into their personal lives, and from there to society as a whole.
At the end of this journey, I want to have enabled people to reach beyond themselves by making the revealed beauty inherent in music such an integral part of their lives that they will search for that beauty in other areas of their lives; and if they do not find it, they will turn inwards through the meditation process to learn how to create and manifest it in their own reality.
L C Vincent

Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.

John Dewey -- Saboteur of American Society

No one has had a more pernicious effect on American education, and by extension the corruption of American society today than John Dewey.  Born in 1870, John Dewey, not to be confused with Melvil Dewey, the inventor of the Dewey decimal system used in libraries, made public education his field of endeavor throughout his long career.   His philosophy, if such it can be called, turned historic American values and logic upside down.

In Dewey’s world view, the individual existed only to serve society. “Socialization” (i.e., the individual’s adjustment in conformity to a group) was seen as more important than factual learning. This twisted view of education infected all of his work, resulting in a century of ever diminishing American academic achievement, with the resultant corruption of American society in a downward spiral that seems to know no end.

Turning Education Inside-Out

John Dewey was born in 1859 in Vermont, received his doctorate from Johns Hopkins University, and joined the staff of the University of Chicago in 1894.  In 1899 he was elected President of the American Psychological Association and from 1904 until his death in 1952, he was a professor of philosophy at Columbia University and Teacher’s College in New York.

According to Dewey, learning was only relevant in context with what Society, and by extension The State, deemed necessary. The acquisition of knowledge for its own sake was regarded as a selfish indulgence. Feelings and emotions were far more valid a barometer of a student’s “adjustment” towards society than the accumulation of facts, or the use of logic and reason. It should come as no surprise, then, that throughout most of his professional life, Dewey proudly wore the label of a Social Progressive.

Dewey was a great admirer of Edward Bellamy’s book, “Looking Back” (1877) which described a Utopian society built upon the dead bones of Capitalism.   An avowed Socialist, Dewey was the originator and champion of “progressive” education in America. He loathed the free society created by Capitalism, with its emphasis on the individual “whose pleasures are to be magnified, and possessions multiplied.”

According to Dewey, Government comes first and its needs must therefore be paramount over any needs or desires of the individual. Society (government) shapes individuals, not vice-versa, claimed Dewey. “Social institutions... are means of creating individuals.” Rather than follow the principles upon which the founding of America was based, Dewey claimed that the individual only existed to serve Society; therefore Society had the right to decide how each individual should best serve it.

Dewey’s philosophy obliterates the concept of Free Will, along with the idea of the self-created individual. Incredibly, almost paradoxically, Dewey ridiculed the pursuit of knowledge for its own sake, declaring that knowledge was only valid and worthwhile if “Society” declared its pursuit justified. Therefore, if the Powers That Be (“Society”) decided that literature, or geometry, or chemistry was no longer a valid pursuit, but multicultural studies, minority oppression, and remedial basket weaving were, then the individual should have no objection -- nor any alternative -- to that course of education.

Every quality one might rightly consider a virtue, including curiosity, resourcefulness, competitiveness, ethical conduct, right reasoning, rhetorical skills, logic and inventiveness -- all of them, according to Dewey, could be considered to be “vices” overnight if the Powers That Be (“Society”) decided they were no longer desirable.

In Dewey’s world, there was no absolute truth. Therefore everything was malleable and changeable. There was no bedrock, no anchor upon which Mankind might attach and secure its intellect,  character, or conduct. Everything was continually in a state of flux, with the only constant being one’s “duty” to Society, to serve it however Society chose to dictate doing so through its institutions.

Rather than trying to understand any form of objective truth, any form of eternal verity, Dewey instead promulgated the concept that the school’s primary mission was the “socialization” of children to one another, NOT the learning of knowledge and facts! An emphasis on group participation, group learning, group problem solving and group activities hammered home the one unbending principle that the individual’s knowledge and will must always be subservient to whatever “group” one currently derived one’s “identity” from at any particular place and time.

In practice, this meant stultifying social conformity to methods of decision making and conduct, and the codification of illogical and inane behavior. Conformity to group thought and conduct was all that mattered. Successful socialization, not academic achievement, gradually became the litmus test of the American educational movement.

Dewey and Progressive Education -- Socialization Trumps Factual Learning

Dewey effectively turned the entire of concept of scholastic education on its head, or perhaps more accurately, he created a cranial-rectal inversion. Rather than studying objective facts in such fields as geometry, geography, history, spelling, reading, writing, and the physical sciences, Dewey proclaimed that children's “social life” and the process of “socialization” (the ‘adjusting’ of each child to ‘get along’ with others) was the paramount role of school in the educational process.

The “Progressive Philosophy” maintains that the cause of social strife is the unwillingness of an individual to sacrifice his or her convictions to the group. The insistence on distinctions (which are based on discrimination-- the ability to differentiate one thing from another!) such as ‘true versus false’ and ‘right versus wrong’ generates social conflict, according to Dewey. If only children did not hold such strong ideas, Dewey reasoned, disagreement and conflict would evaporate in the sunshine of social harmony. Truth, therefore, was seen by Dewey to be socially fractious, while ignorance indeed became bliss. Hence, what the Progressives meant by ‘socialization’ was the surrender of one's mind, and one's independent knowledge and judgment to a ‘group consensus.’

Learning and achievement in any field of study, declared Dewey, was “selfish,” the means whereby a child might separate him or her self from their peers. Above all, Dewey saw the public schools as the most influential way of creating conformity of thought and behavior. This leveling of the learning process predictably produced group comprehension based on the lowest common denominator.

Dewey’s goal was conformity of behavior, thought and action. He actively despised and ridiculed students who strove to learn more, attain more, achieve more, if their goals had not already been preordained by “Society” at large.

Above all, Dewey wanted “top down” control of society by the creation of the common humanity who would come to populate society. Dewey wanted to create cogs for the America machinery of commerce, barely able to think, just sufficiently intelligent to follow instructions, with just enough knowledge to spin the gears of industry and bureaucracy.

Individual human goals such as achievement, invention, curiosity, ingenuity, genius, and the desire for self-improvement were seen as dangerous and detrimental deviations.

In our schools today, the current constant whirlwind of parties, drugs, sports, movie stars, sexual promiscuity, video games, violence, gangs, and celebrities -- the real unwritten core curriculum of today’s centers of higher education -- are the “new normal” for our public school children at every level of society. Learning anything of value is an elective option that few ever exercise

The ridicule and outright hostility towards those students who choose to excel, expressed by other students and often even teachers, is testament to the success of Dewey’s devious legacy, a threat to the socially engineered society he strove so desperately to create. In Dewey’s world, guidelines of behavior, conduct, thought, virtue and learning are not based on Universal Truth or any form of absolute standards, but rather depend upon conformity to a constantly changing and vacuous array of prejudices, social cliques, media clichés and peer pressure. Children who are different from this norm, which would include nearly any child who strives to achieve independent knowledge, leave themselves open to ridicule, hostility, sabotage and disparagement for being “different” than their group-herd mentality peers.

Part II
Dewey Imports the Soviet Model to America

Not surprisingly, Dewey greatly admired the Soviet model, and even visited the Soviet Union in 1928 to observe schools and education in the USSR. He then implemented many recommendations for US schools based on his observations.

Ironically, the Russian government eventually abandoned everything Dewey had erroneously assumed was necessary to produce the model corporate statist citizen. The Russian educational establishment apparently learned that such a process ended up producing conformity of thought along with a complete lack of ambition and juvenile delinquency.

Sometime after Dewey’s visit to Russia after WWII, the USSRs educators adapted what once had been the very definition of the Western American educational process. As a recent émigré’ from Russia succinctly stated: “No socialization, no group projects, and every week - many severe tests. Interclass competition till grinding of teeth. Everyone had their own cherished opinion.”

Ironically, Russian education ended up adopting the system which American education abandoned in favor of the assumed superiority of the “progressive” socialist model. Fortunately for them, the Russians had the ability to be able to clearly see and admit that group conformity and group problem solving spells the death of individual initiative and achievement, and so tossed their former educational model upon the trash heap of history. Would that we could -- and would -- do the same.

Deliberate Dumbing Down

In 1897, John Dewey wrote “My Pedagogic Creed.” One would expect to find, in such a work, that the author would conclude, demonstrate, or discover something to share with readers pertaining to his philosophy of the educational process. Yet on the contrary, Dewey continually repeats the mantra “ I believe.... I believe... I believe....”. One could hardly find more extended articles of faith in the Christian Bible.

Author Bruce Deitrick Price wrote that Dewey not only subverted education; he also subverted the very language of education with his nebulous and purposely vague concepts and theories.   And he nominates this gem for the most revealing John Dewey quote of all time: “The mere absorption of facts and truths is so exclusively an individual affair that it tends very naturally to pass into selfishness. There is not obvious social motive for the acquirement of mere learning, there is no clear social gain in success thereat.” In two sentences, Dewey relegates all art, science, philosophy, history, mathematics, archeology and all related academic fields to the trash heap of irrelevancy. As Price concludes: “All the dumbing down we’ve seen in the last 100 years is right there in that little quote.” And make no mistake: that dumbing down has been both damnable and deliberate.

John Dewey and his friends, like the influential Jewish Marxist propagandist, Sidney Hook, saw the American school system as the thin end of the wedge in their deceitful game to slowly subvert an American society built upon the bricks of religious right and wrong, and ethical conduct and values, towards a secular society composed of no absolutes or moral imperatives; only infinite shades of ever more depressing gray.

Using Rockefeller money to make their subversion a reality thru the establishment of the Teachers College in New York (1922), their goal was to create a new generation not quite as bright as their parents; and with every succeeding generation, just like making continuous copies of copies with a copy machine, the actual content of education -- facts, data, objective truth -- began to fade and become less clear and less comprehensible. The more this process continued, the less understandable became the reasons why freedom of thought and action are inseparable requirements for the healthy, functional representative form of government outlined in our Constitution.

Replacing mathematics, geography, history and science with cooking, sewing, household management and manual training skills necessary to run machinery, Dewey initiated what Price correctly called “...a slow motion coup, carried out, for all practical purposes, in the dead of night. And thus began 100 years of deceit, disingenuousness and dishonesty.”

Educators were now indoctrinated to accept the viewpoint, based on nothing more than Dewey’s belief, that “what” they taught was irrelevant; how and why they taught were the main considerations of the new educators.

Price correctly observes that educators now continue “...concocting an infinitude of programs, methodologies, theories, studies, research, insights, slogans and conceptual breakthroughs....” yet all are meaningless when the children which emerge from the other end of the conveyor belt are still as dumb as a post and as thick as a brick.

Attacking the Building Blocks of Learning

Perhaps nowhere in the entire school curriculum is the educational sabotage of generations of school children more evident than in the deliberate destruction of reading skills. Samuel Blumenfeld, the nation’s most eminent authority on reading, stated that the conspiracy to dumb down generations of American children began with the systematic dismantling and destruction of proven reading programs. The attack began with John Dewey’s 1898 essay, ‘The Primary Education Fetich.’

Dewey’s disciples took over the major educational colleges of Columbia, Chicago and Palo Alto, and began bringing in their colleagues to the exclusion of all contrary viewpoints. Blumenfeld states: “They commissioned books to be written promoting whole-word instruction. And they got publishers to publish the new programs because the professors were in a position to get these new primers purchased by virtually every public school system in the country. Many whole-language advocates are simply the latest of the Socialists who are willing to destroy this country in order to change it.” Blumenfeld aptly and correctly concludes: “Evil is a force in this world, and it manifest itself in many different ways. Including deliberately dumbing down a nation.”

The end result of this madness is clear: by grades 3-4, most children taught to read via the “whole word” method system give up in frustration and become marginal readers for the rest of their lives. There is no reading for pleasure, for knowledge, for growth, for entertainment, for speculation, for theory, for travel or adventure, or for learning.  Reading is now equated with drudgery, imprecision, guessing, failure and misery. Lack of reading skills translates into an extremely negative self image with consequences that flow over to every other academic subject in school, which all require reading skills to one degree or another.

As Malkin Dare, founder of the Society of Quality Education, stated: “The result is massive illiteracy and misery.” Don Potter, phonics expert, concludes that memorizing “sight words” as a part of the whole language fraud “...creates a reflex that interferes with later phonics instruction. Sight words are an obstacle to reading, not an aid.” Boys, especially, have their self-confidence destroyed and give up, often being diagnosed with ether dyslexia or ADD. It becomes a vicious, downward spiral of failure.   And it is all premeditated!

Part III

The Frankfurt Institute and the Planned Corruption of America

As the late educator and founder of the National Review, Ralph Toledano stated, the Neo-Marxists were not content to destroy economic Capitalism in America. They had much broader goals, leading back to Marx’s original impulses; the complete mental and spiritual destruction of the entire society and every institution in it. Only in this way, they thought, could the fertile grounds for a true Marxist revolution be brought into existence.

Toledano states: “So in 1922, the conspiracy was hatched at the Marx-Engels Institute in Moscow by Karl Radek, a power in the Politburo and the representative of Lenin; Felix Djerzhinski, head of the Soviet secret police, Georg Lukacs, cultural commissar of the short-lived Hungarian Bolshevik revolution, and Willie Muenzenberg, the Comintern’s organizational genius.

The seemingly modest instrument anointed to undermine Western Civilization was the Institute of Social Research, planted in the prestigious Frankfurt University, and dedicated to neo-Marxism.  This group became known as the “Frankfurt School” through the ‘Institute of Social Research’ located at Frankfurt University. The school was funded by Felix Weil, whose doctoral dissertation was “the practical problems of implementing socialism.”

According to Toledano, the Institute “....had a connection to almost every debasement of art and culture.” It’s greatest achievement was establishing a beach head at the Teacher’s College of New York, thanks to the efforts of John Dewey and Columbia University.

In 1922, a meeting was organized by Lenin in Russia to address the question as to why a worker’s revolution had not already occurred throughout the Western World. It was determined that the fertile social grounds for sewing the seeds of Communist revolution would never exist unless and until society had reached a state of hopelessness and alienation necessary to provoke a socialist revolution.

Among those at the meeting, one George Lukacs initiated a unique proposition -- harnessing the sexual energy of the individual for the destruction of the bourgeois state, society and all of its social institutions. Timothy Mathews writes in “Frankfurt School: Conspiracy to Corrupt” that in order to undermine the Christian legacy of the West, Lukacs and the Frankfurt School recommended the following points in their agenda to advance their ‘quiet’ revolution:

1. The creation of racism offenses
2. Continual change to create confusion
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking
7. Emptying of churches
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits
10. Control and dumbing down of media
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family

One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pansexualism’ - the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:

o attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.

o abolish differences in the education of boys and girls

o abolish all forms of male dominance - hence the presence of women in the armed forces

o declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors’

The Frankfurt School believed there were two types of revolution: (a) political and (b) cultural. Cultural revolution demolishes from within. They saw their Marxist cultural revolution as a long-term project and kept their sights clearly focused on the family, education, media, sex and popular culture.

After Hitler came to power in Germany in 1933, The Institute of Social Research was moved to America and its members fled to Columbia University, Princeton, Brandeis and Cal Berkeley . Once in America, the Institute was more circumspect and deleted all references to Marxism or Communism, preferring to use the euphemistic substitutes of “dialectical materialism” or “the materialist theory.” They began to focus on discovering what was the “psychological cement” of society, and strove to discover what held Western society together; for once discovered, they could then also determine what would dissolve it.

Eventually the ISR members determined what it would take to weaken and destroy American society, or at least change it sufficiently so that American mass culture became supportive of the social ends and goals of Marxism. Their goal consisted of subverting the family, education, media, sexual roles and popular culture. Needless to say, every single one of these institutions has been under relentless attack since Dewey used Rockefeller money enabled the Institute of Social Research to bring their planned corruption to America.

Secular Humanism Displaces Religious Values -- NEA Applauds

We can see the success of Dewey’s philosophy in the elimination of all contemporary Christian references in our schools. The Western religious traditions upon which this country was founded are nowhere to be seen. In their place, we have a conglomeration of global myths, legends, rituals and multicultural experiences.

The National Education Association (NEA) applauded the foundations of UNESCO, as a “culmination of a movement for the creation an an international agency of education.” UNESCO seeks to impose the “standards” of a new global management system on the World’s teaching professions; or to put it simply, to spread John Dewey’s poisonous and erroneous assumptions throughout the world and thereby continue the dumbing down process on a global scale.

Under the rubric of “Saving the Earth”, the NEA promotes every goal codified in “Agenda 21” of the United Nations, including (civilian) disarmament, abortion, and a call for “lifelong learning” -- an open-ended program to manipulate adults into old age to make human “resources” conform to the mold demanded of them by the coming new “global” society, wherein the adult population, as “lifelong learners” must be ready to lie, spy, fight and die for whatever ideals their global managers assert are desirable for the time they choose to implement them.

Today the culture, or more accurately, “cult” of political correctness can be traced directly back to the Frankfurt School and the Institute for Social Research. As Timothy Smith correctly states: “‘...political correctness’, which has been destroying our family bonds, our religious tradition and our entire culture sprang from the Frankfurt School.”

According to ‘progressive’ author Craig A. Cunningham, Dewey’s ideas “...about education have resulted in a recent surge of juvenile violence, a marked reduction in subject-matter, knowledge and basic skills among America’s children, a pernicious increase in state control of education and of thought, and an epidemic of dishonesty in business and public life.” Why should such a track record of destruction still produce more teaching graduates and educators eager to follow the same path? As author Cates states: “...the Progressives had acquired such a stranglehold in the field of education that no one could expect to advance in that field unless he or she burned incense to John Dewey."

Craig A. Cunningham continues: "Erase the concept of truth--these educators maintain--and a child will never discover that he is thinking or acting wrongly. If he is taught that anything he does is right because he feels it, he will always ‘feel good’ about himself." Dewey’s educational philosophy prepares students as future citizens of the collective (Socialist/Communist) state. For Dewey, social ends are State ends. The entire thrust of Dewey’s philosophy is conformity to the State.

The Ayn Rand institute claims that Dewey’s emphasis on “pragmatism” -- that is doing what works, irrespective of ‘arbitrary’ standards of “right or wrong, good or evil” is the basis for the plethora of fraudulent business practices which infest our society today.

One article The Ayn Rand Institute authored stated succinctly: “For more than 100 years our intellectuals, specifically our college professors, have been teaching students, including future businessmen, that no absolute principles or standards exist, that you cannot be certain of anything, that the future is unknowable, that it is okay to try anything without thinking, that the truth is simply that which works at the moment, and that which works is what makes you feel better right now. In other words, there is nothing really wrong with dishonesty.... Anyone who questions this philosophy is mocked as a dogmatic, narrow-minded, preachy moralist. Pragmatism is an open invitation to fraud--after all, you might get away with it and the money makes you feel good."

Dewey's Corruption of the American Educational System
It is more than interesting to see how John Dewey’s gifts to American education have impacted American society at large. To better understand the ills which afflict our society today, we must first examine the fruits of Dewey’s theorems in the classroom and extrapolate the results onto American society at large. The linkages are often quite direct.

Some of the fruits of John Dewey's “vision” in the classroom include the following:

o schools no longer employ teachers, but “facilitators” and facilitators are no longer “authority figures” with knowledge, but friends and pals who help children “get along”

o any form of corrective discipline in our schools, especially physical discipline, is seen as a form of oppression -- result: no punishment for bad or disruptive behavior

o children's “social interests” and “self expression” are more important than their “intellectual interests” -- placing feelings over factual learning.  Student’ feelings are what matter -- not “facts” or knowledge

o “cooperative learning” promotes lowest common denominator “group think” for problem solving exercises

o whole language (word memorization) rather than phonics (word construction) permanently cripples children's ability to read, which effectively sabotages their reading comprehension for the rest of their lives

o “fuzzy math”’ and “inventive spelling”, where children are lauded for their “creativity” in word creation rather than graded on an objectively right or wrong answer, is the new norm; this permanently corrupts children's ability or desire to solve problems and achieve the one correct answer;

o the self-esteem movement and mantra -- all opinions are equally valuable -- continues. For if the child can be made to feel good about him/her self, irrespective of any objective, valid reason for doing so, then they will provide less friction with their peers, thereby enhancing the process of “socialization, which is the true goal of the educational process in Deweyland.  The “self-esteem” movement tries to patch up the emotional wreckage of children who cannot read, write, spell or solve mathematical problems;

o the drugging of an entire generation of students for ADD and other social-behavioral disorders, often created in the classroom by such programs as “whole word” “fuzzy math” and “creative spelling”, is now rampant in an environment which ironically prides itself as having “zero tolerance” for drugs

o sports without scoring -- no more score keeping; Dewey;’s acolytes maintain that scores create antisocial attitudes of “competition” ; now all participants simply receive awards for showing up!

o outcome based education -- envisions universal educational standards, serving the aims of the globalist agenda by leveling the acquisition of knowledge

o no grades other than pass or fail -- grades promote antisocial “competition”

o emotion -- not reason -- is the student’s link to reality

These are the true “fruits” of decades of Dewey’s deliberate destruction of education in America. We are reaping the rewards of a program designed to sabotage the individual’s the ability to think in hierarchical values of relevance. We are confronting the rotten residue of decades, casting the concept of individual scholastic achievement as irrelevant, a form of competitive “hostility”, while placing the spotlight of reward and recognition on team sports and athletics, socialization and popularity.

It is the world of truth, logic, substance, meaning, relevance, hierarchy, and discrimination turned upside down and inside out -- resulting in the graduation of students in high school and college who cannot read, write, spell, add, subtract or think. They are the fundamental byproduct of John Dewey’s profound cranial-rectal inversion, his demented, demagogic, deadly world view. They personify the most vulgar speculations of late night television hosts, who prove with simple questions that our schools, in every state and at every level, are consistent in producing students who exemplify the living epithet of mental matter composed of fecal waste occupying the space between their ears.

Part V

Dewey's Corruption of the Schools Spreads to American Society

Eventually, students leave school and graduate, taking whatever they have learned and absorbed, and join society as workers, laborers, business people and.... educators.

Considering that the detritus of John Dewey’s theories has been infecting American society since the turn of the last century, it is not surprising that beyond the continued lowering of academic standards, we should also find the following symptoms now visibly rampant:

o values are changeable and transitory -- there are no “absolutes”

o situational ethics and “relativism” are now an acceptable philosophy of life -- if it feels good, do it

o feminism is now promoted as if one sex has all the answers to society’s ills -- and since women have the answers, men should emulate them

o a parallel rise in teen violence and delinquency can be observed, based on scholastic irrelevancy and frustration, along with the destruction of traditional male/female, father-mother role models and the blurring of sexual identities this creates

o rampant drug use and abuse

o rampant sexual promiscuity and experimentation, pregnancies at increasingly younger ages, along with the debasement and degradation of young women and men

o fashions -- especially for youth as seen promoted on television and shows geared towards teens -- now promote the look of prostitutes as role models for women, and pimps and gang bangers for men

o an emphasis on excessive drinking and alcohol consumption via popular MTV shows to fit into the group behavioral consensus

o a massive, unrestricted flow of illegal immigration to balkanize and fragment our society

o affirmative action -- scholastic and professional opportunities opened to all ethnic and sexual minorities with little concern over qualifications

o sensitivity training --necessary to indoctrinate business men and women to be “sensitive” to minorities of all persuasions and sexualities

o hate speech restrictions: any word, phrase or line of social or historic inquiry which might possibly offend some ethnic or sexual minority somewhere is now “off limits” or forbidden because it is considered “politically incorrect”

o pc -- political correctness: a Marxist concept now loose in the public domain used to determine and control thought, speech and behavior by Caucasians, especially Caucasian males towards any other sexual group or people or persons of color

o the creation of an increasingly unethical and predatory business class and financial elite. Since there are no absolutes of right or wrong, whatever “works” must therefore be “good” -- for them...

o the metro-sexual society; sexuality is now a “choice” and bi means “having it” both ways; the blurring of sexual identities

o the creation of the pedophile priesthood, a ‘social’ project of the homosexual radical underground which purposely infiltrated seminaries in the 1950’s and 60’s to take advantage of and damage the Catholic and Protestant Christian churches throughout the Western world while indulging their predilection for pedophilia;

o the recruiting of males and females for combat positions on war ships; soon the adoption of openly gay men and women in military units; and finally, the inevitable acceptance of transsexuals in positions of military authority;

All of these current aberrations in our society can be traced back to the “progressive” philosophy of education, based on the nebulous principles of John Dewey’s numerous “beliefs” which are nothing more than declarations based upon zero empirical knowledge.

Once Dewey had established his beachhead in academia, Rockefeller--Illuminist money made it possible to bring over the Marxist “Institute for Social Research” which carried over the destruction Dewey started in the school room and brought it further into the board room and then into the main stream of American life.

It is no wonder that in the same year -- 1933 -- C. F. Potter, John Dewey’s co-author of the Humanist Manifesto, called for the synthesizing of all religions and "a socialized and cooperative economic order."


Like Hitler and Goebbels, Dewey and Potter realized the importance of infecting youth with their distinct world vision. Almost paraphrasing Hitler’s famous statement on education, C. F. Potter concluded: "Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?"

Now more than 6 decades later, we can view the wreckage strewn over the sands of time in American society since this “pragmatic” “progressive”,  humanistic, secular approach to education was foisted on America by a peculiar mix of Socialists and Communists backed by the Illuminist forces of destruction thru Rockefeller dollars.

The evidence is all too clear; the remedy is as well. Home schooling, local parental control over schools and education, the abolition of all Federal involvement, the elimination of the PTA, the elimination of all teacher’s unions, and a return to the basics and classics of education taught before John Dewey’s deadly vision corrupted American education and society -- only these steps can eventually bring about an American cultural Renaissance.

We must permanently replace all of John Dewey’s speculative theorems; we must promote instead the eternal virtues and principles which have made this country great, and restore the truths, ethics, conduct and values which have served as the eternal bedrock to the anchor of our Constitutional Republic.

L C Vincent


Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.