Saturday, October 9, 2010

CIA Runs American TV Network News From Day One for the Illuminati

There is No "News"; It's All Programming!

After WWII, with the emergence of three rival television networks, each with their own news departments, most Americans would have argued that the new age of television would grant them a multiplicity of sources and viewpoints. They would point to the three competing television networks: ABC, CBS and NBC, as proof that the capitalist system of competition worked to provide them with the latest news, and that their respective news departments were working to scoop each other to bring the American public the most honest, comprehensive and in depth analysis of the stories behind the day’s headlines.

Yet from their very inception, each of the American television networks have been guided by men who were a product of and beholden to America’s intelligence agencies. From the beginning, the men who ran ABC, CBS and NBC as well as those sitting on their boards of directors, had the deepest ties to the CIA, the Council on Foreign Relations, Rothschild Banks and the Rockefeller Foundation. From the very beginning, the American television networks and American news media have been a product that has been created, shaped and molded to promote the aims of the globalists and their New World Order, guided by the “light” of the Illuminati.

Three Networks, One Master

According to the late investigative reporter Eustace Mullins, CBS Chairman William S. Paley was both conduit and operative for the CIA. Many directors of CBS had CIA ties. NBC and ABC Television networks were also riddled with CIA influenced directors with links to this U.S. intelligence agency. A pattern of interlocking directorships reveals these patterns in multiple variations. Linkages such as multiple directors of various Federal Reserve Bank branches, directors to numerous banks with Rothschild and JP Morgan connections, and links to Kuhn Loeb &; Co., First City Bancorp and The Institute of Strategic Studies in London, as well as various Rockefeller foundations and memberships in the Council on Foreign Relations, were and are commonplace.

So while the illusion of 3 competing television networks with three apparently independent, competing news departments remain the public facade of television journalism, the reality is that the interlocking directorates and board memberships of multiple international businesses clearly illustrate that the members of the boards of directors of all three networks partake in numerous symbiotic and parallel financial investments, which point to inescapable, even severe conflicts of interest.

Yet without these overlapping network directorships heavily larded with CIA - Rockefeller - Morgan - Rothschild - CFR linkages, the CIA made a concerted effort from the start of the electronic information age to not simply shade and tilt news stories to their liking, but to actively recruit reporters and journalists as CIA assets to be used to quash stories they wished ignored, or to distort and selectively bias the presentation of stories they wished to use for their own purposes.

Making a “Mock” ery of The News

The code name for this work, appropriately enough, was “Operation Mockingbird.” A mockingbird is a creature with the natural gift to mimic or mirror whatever song another bird makes. So, too, the CIA's “embedded” reporters, editors and owners would mirror whatever particular slant The Agency wished the general public to perceive, or the opposite: they would instruct their sources to bury or ignore stories which did not serve their purpose.

According to author Steve Kangas, in his article “Anatomy of the Overclass”, the CIA recruited 25 media organizations and over 400 reporters and journalists to do their bidding since the late 1940’s. This was revealed to the Church Committee in 1975, and many felt that The Agency’s reach went even deeper. The list of assets and operatives included:

* William Paley (President, CBS Network)
* ABC Network
* NBC Network
* Philip and Katharine Graham (Publishers, Washington Post)
* Henry Luce (Publisher, Time and Life magazine)
* Arthur Hays Sulzberger (Publisher, N.Y. Times)
* Jerry O'Leary (Washington Star)
* Hal Hendrix (Pulitzer Prize winner, Miami News)
* Barry Bingham Sr., (Louisville Courier-Journal)
* James Copley (Copley News Services)
* Joseph Harrison (Editor, Christian Science Monitor)
* C.D. Jackson (Fortune)
* Walter Pincus (Reporter, Washington Post)
* Associated Press
* United Press International
* Reuters
* Hearst Newspapers
* Scripps-Howard
* Newsweek magazine
* Mutual Broadcasting System
* Miami Herald
* New York Herald-Tribune

Perhaps it would have been more prudent if the Church committee had instead asked which news organizations the CIA had not subverted; it would surely have produced a shorter list!

In the case of the Washington Post, “...owner Philip Graham was a military intelligence officer in World War II, and later became close friends with CIA figures like Frank Wisner, Allen Dulles, Desmond FitzGerald and Richard Helms. He inherited the Post by marrying Katherine Graham, whose father owned it.” Graham was reported to have committed suicide in 1963.

Another example of the CIA’s reach: According to Kangas, “...Sig Mickelson was a CIA asset the entire time he was president of CBS News from 1954 to 1961. Later he went on to become president of Radio Free Europe and Radio Liberty, two major outlets of CIA propaganda.”

But even worse -- the CIA actually “owned” (thru proxy) several media outlets, including Capital Cities, whose owner, William Casey, later became the Director of the CIA under Ronald Reagan. Capital Cities later bought the entire ABC Television Network.

To illustrate the CIA’s amazingly thorough and pervasive control over the flow of information, just consider this one amazing tidbit. Nearly everyone alive with any knowledge of the John Kennedy assassination knows about “The Zapruder  Film," the film shot by Abraham Zapruder, which purports to show JFK being hit by one bullet to the head.

Forgetting, for the moment, that the Zapruder film has been recently revealed to have been altered and rearranged via computer animation before ever being made available to the general public, this writer was amazed to discover while doing research for this story that there are actually numerous “other” films of the JFK assassination, ALL OF WHICH remain locked in the vaults of various news organizations, and which have never seen the public light of day. As revealed by author Richard E. Sprague, in “The Taking of America, 1-2-3”, these films include:

The Dorman movie -  Private
The Robert Hughes movie -  Private
The David Weigman TV footage - NBC
The Malcolm Couch TV footage - ABC
The John Martin movie -  Private

The question that immediately comes to mind upon realizing that ALL of this footage has been so suppressed that its very existence is unknown to the general public, begs the question: WHY? The answer is equally obvious -- it’s airing would provide proof positive of a conspiracy to kill Kennedy, a conspiracy which no one would any longer dismiss as a “theory.”

There is probably no better example of the influence and weight the CIA can bring to bear on unwanted news than the story of San Jose’ (California) Mercury-News reporter Gary Webb.

In 1996, “crack” reporter Gary Webb ran a voluminously detailed three part article entitled “Dark Alliance”, exposing the CIA’s involvement in the importation and distribution of crack cocaine throughout the Los Angeles ghettos, while also supplying the notorious Cripps and Bloods gangs with drugs to distribute throughout America.

As Susan Bell of the “Independent/UK” newspaper wrote: “Webb's pieces were not dealing with nameless peasants slaughtered in some distant republic, but demonstrated a clear link between the CIA and the suppliers of the gangs delivering crack to the ghetto of Watts, in South Central Los Angeles.” Not surprisingly, there was very little “pick up” of the story by other “independent” news agencies and organizations., many of which the CIA controlled.

Shaping Perception by Casting Doubt and Aspersions

Despite meticulous research and multiple source verification, Webb and the Mercury-News were mercilessly attacked by The Washington Post, the NY Times and The Los Angeles Times. According to author Kangas, The Washington Post attack article was written by the long time CIA journalist, Walter Pincus.

Eventually, under this savage barrage of criticism, the Mercury-News first distanced itself from Webb’s series of articles, then disowned them as not being properly substantiated. Webb lost his job at the Mercury-News and became a freelancer.

On December 13, 2004, Pulitzer Prize winning reporter Gary Webb was found in his apartment shot dead, an apparent “suicide” according to the coroner -- although the coroner’s report did note that Webb had to shoot himself TWICE to get the job done...   Of course....!

Entertain, Distract, Divide and Conquer

Besides the repression and burial of disturbing stories, distraction and diversion are the other aspects of the Zionist--Illuminati game plan as revealed in The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. Nowhere can this be found more prevalent than on our network “news” nightly reports, which are often filled with stories about sports stars, movie stars, media celebrities and scandals. A prime example of this ploy was the The O.J. Simpson television-news “tsunami” of his murder trial which was used to take the heat off of many of Bill Clinton’s constitutional transgressions by moving the spotlight away from Clinton to O.J.

Conveniently, our electronic news media always seem preoccupied with some scandal or other that often seems to coincidentally emerge at the exact same time when news of an embarrassing political nature vies for public attention. As I write this, the “saga” of actress Lindsey Lohan’s 90 day jail sentence for parole violation, and her tearful courtroom entreaties, has effectively bumped the Obama administration’s decision not to prosecute members of the Black Panther Party in a clear cut case of voter intimidation outside of a voting place, despite the fact that members of the Panthers have stated in a recording that White “Cracker” babies should be killed . The networks have their priorities.... and keeping us informed about events which actually have a bearing upon our lives is not one of them.

The Hydra Speaks with One Voice

To anyone who seriously wishes to see the difference between American “news” reporting of a controversial, political event versus reportage from outside this country, the easiest method is to select one internationally important story and see what is revealed and suppressed by reading the same story on the internet from multiple news sources around the world. One quickly gathers the essence of the information that our “handlers” would prefer us not to know. Perhaps the most obvious example of this recent phenomenon is the story concerning the Israeli interdiction (assault) of the relief ship convoy to Gaza.

Other than internet sources from other countries, one could hardly find a “discouraging word” from any U.S. media outlet or commentator, whether on television, radio, newspapers or news magazines. The consensus was brutally simple: Israel was correct to “protect” itself by boarding these supply ships with armed commandos dangling from helicopters in the middle of the night and killing more than 10 unarmed people, while confiscating all recording devices for good measure. Surveying the American national media about this story, one could ONLY conclude that there could possibly be NO OTHER side than Israel’s until one read internet reports from other countries citing the logical and inhuman inconsistencies ignored by Israel’s American media propaganda outlets.

And so it goes. It should come as no surprise, then, that Senator Joseph Lieberman has introduced a bill in the U.S. Senate to enable any president to turn off the Internet for “national security” purposes. Indeed, as Lieberman has pointed out, China already has this ability and we should too! Right. China should be our “model” for news reportage and in-depth analysis, and when a news story is too “controversial” then just shut off the ‘net for the sake of “national security.”  What could be simpler?

As we face the ever further restrictions on our speech, assembly, press freedoms (Supreme Court nominee Ellen Kagan could not even bring herself to admit that the First Amendment prohibits government censorship), it behooves us to realize that this continued assault on our right to know goes hand in hand with The Illuminati’s plan to create an ever further dumbed down citizenry, too distracted and stupefied by meaningless stories of celebrity and drama to discern the critically important stories which crucially impact our God-given freedoms and our way of life.

The time may soon come when the right to even question public officials will be looked upon as a “terrorist assault” and asking embarrassing questions of the political elite may be codified as “hate speech” thanks to the Illuminati’s continued corruption of our thought and language, along with their control and shaping of the flow of what might be considered “news.”

As guardians of the heritage of our Founding Fathers, we must make sure that this is the one dawning day which will never cast its light upon our future.

L C Vincent

Copyright 2010, L C Vincent, all rights reserved.  No portion of this material may be reproduced in any media, in whole or in part, without the expressed written permission of the author.

No comments:

Post a Comment